1887

Abstract

Summary

Seismic data contain rich information carried by different types of waves, such as direct arrivals (P- and S-waves), reflections, diffractions and surface-waves. In order to utilize a specific type of wave, one needs to isolate this wanted signal from others. We propose a method to extract and/or remove mainly the dispersive surface-waves based on their geometrical property in the shot-receiver-time domain for seismic data acquired along 2D acquisition profiles. We first assemble all shot gathers into a pseudo 3D data with dimensions of shot locations, receiver locations, and time. The shot-receiver-time domain enables us to process the data along different dimensions, not restricted to the shot domain only. With the assumption of a 1D velocity model, we find that the dispersive surface-waves in a shot gather behave linearly in a time isochrone, which cuts through all shots and receivers. The linear geometrical property of the surface-waves in the time isochrone allows us to extract them efficiently and effectively using for example curvelet-based transforms. By applying the method along the time isochrones for the time samples where surface-waves are present, surface-waves can be extracted from the pseudo 3D data. We exemplify this method using a synthetic data and a field data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120015
2021-08-29
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ding, Y., and Malehmir, A.
    [2020]. Reverse time migration (RTM) imaging of iron-oxide deposits in the Ludvika mining area, Sweden [Preprint]. Solid Earth Discuss.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hennenfent, G., Fenelon, L., and Herrmann, F. J.
    [2010]. Nonequispaced curvelet transform for seismic data reconstruction: A sparsity-promoting approach. GEOPHYSICS, 75(6), WB203–WB210.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu, H., and Zheng, Y.
    [2019]. Data-driven dispersive surface-wave prediction and mode separation using high-resolution dispersion estimation. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 171, 103867.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jiwei, L., Junhua, Z., Xiaobing, L., Rongchang, F., and Xiaoxu, D.
    [2019]. Study on the method of suppressing surface wave by Curvelet transform. SEG 2018 Workshop: SEG Seismic Imaging Workshop, Beijing, China, 12–14 November 2018, 82–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Maries, G., Malehmir, A., and Marsden, P.
    [2020]. Cross-profile seismic data acquisition, imaging and modeling of iron-oxide deposits: a case study from Blötberget, south central Sweden. GEOPHYSICS, 1–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. McMechan, G. A., and Sun, R.
    [1991]. Depth filtering of first breaks and ground roll. GEOPHYSICS, 56(3), 390–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mousa, W. A., and Al-Shuhail, A. A.
    [2012]. Enhancement of first arrivals using the τ-p transform on energy-ratio seismic shot records. GEOPHYSICS, 77(3), V101–V111.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Papadopoulou, M., Da Col, F., Mi, B., Bäckström, E., Marsden, P., Brodic, B., Malehmir, A., and Socco, L. V.
    [2020]. Surface‐wave analysis for static corrections in mineral exploration: A case study from central Sweden. Geophysical Prospecting, 68(1), 214–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Socco, L. V., and Strobbia, C.
    [2004]. Surface-wave method for near-surface characterization: a tutorial. Near Surface Geophysics, 2(4), 165–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tang, S., Ding, Y., Zhou, H., and Zhou, H.
    [2020]. Reconstruction of Sparsely Sampled Seismic Data via Residual U-Net. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120015
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120015
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error