1887

Abstract

Summary

The fracture system of a slowly moving loess landslide was studied by the well-known ERT method and by Pressure-Probe which is a simple geotechnical tool. Its application was possible because the fractures were hidden only by a few cm thick soil. Results of both methods were compared with each other and also with the reality, because exploration of the fractures was easily possible. The largest fractures which were detected by these methods served later on as sliding surfaces verifying perfectly the results of these techniques. With these methods the fracture system can be described and thus the endangered area can be delineated. They enable also prediction of future rupture surfaces and better understanding the inner structure of a landslide and thus its development.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120028
2021-08-29
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AgnesiV., CamardabM., ConoscentiaC., Di MaggioA., DilibertocI., MadoniacP., RotiglianoaE.
    [2005] A multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation of the mechanism that triggered the Cerda landslide. (Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology, 65, 101–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BányaiL, ÚjváriG, MentesGy, KovácsM, CzapZ, GribovszkiK, PappG.
    [2014] Recurrent landsliding of a high bank at Dunaszekcső, Hungary: geodetic deformation monitoring and finite element modeling. Geomorphology, 210:1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BièvreG., JongmansD., WiniarskiT., ZumboV.
    [2012] Application of geophysical measurements for assessing the role of fissures in water infiltration within a clay landslide (Trieves area, French Alps). Hydrological Processes, 26, 2128–2142.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FanC., LiangS., MaX.
    [2012] Research Advances on the Loess-Bedrock Landslide in China. Asia Pacific Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. JongmansD., GaramboisS.
    [2007] Geophysical investigation of landslides: a review. Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr.33, 101–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KraftJ.
    [2005] A dunaszekcsői Töröklyuk kialakulása és fennmaradása (Evolution and survival of the Töröklyuk cave at Dunaszekcső). Mecsek Egyesület Évkönyve Új Évfolyam 8, 133–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LapennaV., LorenzoP., PerroneA., PiscitelliS., RizzoE., SdaoF.
    [2005] 2D electrical resistivity imaging of some complex landslides in Lucanian Apennine chain. Geophysics, 70, B11–B18.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PerroneA., LapennaV., PiscitelliS.
    [2014] Electrical resistivity tomography technique for landslide investigation: A review, Earth-Science Re-C1925 views. 135, 65–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Solberg, I. L., Hansen, L., Ronning, J.S., Haugen, E.D., Dalsegg, E., Tonnesen, J.F.
    , [2012] Combined geophysical and geotechnical approach to ground investigations and hazard zonation of a quick clay area, mid-Norway, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.71, 119–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SzalaiS., SzokoliK., MetwalyM.
    [2014] Delineation of landslide endangered areas and mapping their fracture systems by the pressure probe method. Landslides, 11(5). 923–932.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Szalai, S., Szokoli, K., Metwaly, M., GribovszkiZ., PrácserE.
    [2017] Prediction of the location of future rupture surfaces of a slowly moving loess landslide by electrical resistivity tomography, Geophysical Prospecting. 65, 596–616.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. SzokoliK., SzarkaL., MetwalyM., KalmárJ., PrácserE., SzalaiS.
    [2018] Characterisation of a landslide by its fracture system using Electric Resistivity Tomography and Pressure Probe methods. Acta Geod. et Geoph.53(1), 15–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. TofaniV., SegoniS., AgostiniA., CataniF., CasagliN.
    [2013] Technical Note: Use of remote sensing for landslide studies in Europe. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.13, 299–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ÚjváriG, MentesGy, BányaiL, KraftJ, GyimóthyA, KovácsJ
    [2009] Evolution of a bank failure along the River Danube at Dunaszekcső, Hungary. Geomorphology109, 197–209.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120028
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120028
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error