1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. NSG2021 27th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Soil infiltration is used as an outlet for the discharge of domestic treated wastewater. The sizing of these infiltration areas in a heterogeneous soil context is difficult, due in particular to the spatial measurement of saturated hydraulic conductivity, which is costly and time-consuming to implement. Nowaday, there is no adequate technique for evaluating the variability of satured hydraulic conductivity for a heterogeneous soil. The development of a methodology for the spatial characterization of soil properties is essential. We demonstrate here the benefit of using Bayesian Maximum Entropy data fusion to obtain a 2D representation of the infiltration capacity of heterogeneous soils. This tool opens up prospects for improving the sizing of infiltration areas, in context of heterogeneous soil.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120101
2021-08-29
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120101
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Audebert, M., Oxarango, L., Duquennoi, C., Touze-Foltz, N., Forquet, N., Clément, R.
    , 2016. Understanding leachate flow in municipal solid waste landfills by combining time-lapse ERT and subsurface flow modelling — Part II: Constraint methodology of hydrodynamic models. Waste Manag.55, 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.005
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bisone, S., Gautier, M., Masson, M., Forquet, N.
    , 2017. Influence of loading rate and modes on infiltration of treated wastewater in soil-based constructed wetland. Environ. Technol.38, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1185165
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Christakos, G., Serre, M.L., Bogaert, P.
    , 2002. Temporal GIS: Advanced Functions for Field-Based Applications.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Clément, R., Bergeron, M., Moreau, S.
    , 2011. COMSOL Multiphysics Modelling for Measurement Device of Electrical Resistivity in Laboratory test cell, in European Comsol Conference, edited, Stuttgart.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Clement, R., Moreau, S.
    , 2016. How should an electrical resistivity tomography laboratory test cell be designed? Numerical investigation of error on electrical resistivity measurement. J. Appl. Geophys.127, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.02.008
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Clément, R., Moreau, S., Henine, H., Guérin, A., Chaumont, C., Tournebize, J.
    , 2014. On the value of combining surface and cross-borehole ERT measurements to study artificial tile drainage processes. Near Surf. Geophys.12, 763–776. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2014034
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Doussan, C., Ruy, S.
    , 2009. Prediction of unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity with electrical conductivity. Water Resour. Res.45. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007309
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Han, X., Liu, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z.
    , 2016. Identifying soil structure along headwater hillslopes using ground penetrating radar based technique. J. Mt. Sci.13, 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3279-7
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hellman, K., Ronczka, M., Günther, T., Wennermark, M., Rücker, C., Dahlin, T.
    , 2017. Structurally coupled inversion of ERT and refraction seismic data combined with cluster-based model integration. J. Appl. Geophys.143, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.06.008
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Loke, M.H., Chambers, J.E., Rucker, D.F., Kuras, O., Wilkinson, P.B.
    , 2013. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Appl. Geophys.135–156.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Rücker, C., Günther, T., Wagner, F.M.
    , 2017. pyGIMLi: An open-source library for modelling and inversion in geophysics. Comput. Geosci.109, 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.07.011
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Serre, M.L., Christakos, G.
    , 1999. Modern geostatistics: computational BME analysis in the light of uncertain physical knowledge - the Equus Beds study. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess.13, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004770050029
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Siegrist, R.L.
    , 2014. Engineering design of a modern soil treatment unit. Innovations in soil-based onsite wastewater treatment, in: Soil Society Society of America Conference Proceeding, Albuquerque (NM).
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120101
Loading
Data Fusion of ERT and Infiltration Tests, Using Bayesian Maximum Entropy to Mapping Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Conference Proceedings 2021, 1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202120101
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120101
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120101
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error