1887

Abstract

Summary

Sensitivity, resolution, and data quality are important parameters to consider when designing an ERT cross-borehole survey. We present an open-source algorithm for computing 2D and 3D sensitivity patterns of any borehole setup and use this to compare single-borehole and different cross-borehole electrode configurations, which both show complex patterns. To study the resolution capability of an entire survey, the model resolution matrix is computed for a field dataset. The dataset is split into different electrode configurations and the model resolution matrices of the different configuration are compared. The results show that the sensitivity and resolution decreases very quickly away from the electrodes, especially for the single-borehole configurations. In the studied field case, this means cross-borehole configurations are needed to correctly image the area between the boreholes, even though the cross-borehole data often are associated with a lower signal-to-noise ratio due to near-zero potential measurements and generally more outliers. The study concludes that in a production mode, where acquisition time and thus the number of possible data points are limited, the combination of electrode configurations must be carefully considered and a trade-off between resolution and data quality must be evaluated.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120114
2021-08-29
2021-12-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auken, E. et al.
    , 2014. An overview of a highly versatile forward and stable inverse algorithm for airborne, ground-based and borehole electromagnetic and electric data, Explor.Geophys, 46(3), 223–235
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bing, Z., Greenhalgh, S.A.
    , 2000. Cross-hole resistivity tomography using different electrode configurations.Geophysical Prospecting, 48, 887–912
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Danielsen, B.E., Dahlin, T.
    2010. Numerical modelling of resolution and sensitivity of ERT in horizontal boreholes, Journal of Applied Geophysics, Volume 70, Issue 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Madsen, L.M., Fiandaca, G., Auken, E.
    (2020): 3-D time-domain spectral inversion of resistivity and full-decay induced polarization data - full solution of Poisson’s equation and modelling of the current waveform.Geophysical Journal International, 223 (3), 2101–2116.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Menke, W.
    (1989). Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, volume 45 of International Geophysics Series. Academic Press Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Spitzer, K.
    (1998), The three‐dimensional DC sensitivity for surface and subsurface sources.Geophysical Journal International, 134: 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00592.x
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wilkinson, P.B., Chambers, J.E., Lelliott, M., Wealthall, G.P., Ogilvy, R.D.
    , 2008. Extreme sensitivity of crosshole electrical resistivity tomography measurements to geometric errors.Geophysical Journal International173, 49–62.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120114
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202120114
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error