1887

Abstract

Summary

The drastic increase of the observed seismicity at fluid injection sites has led to the need for further development of automatic picking methods for seismic events. Here, we focused on a pattern matching technique, which has traditionally relied on a representative Master event. However, this method strongly depends on the selection of the Master Event, which can be challenging with low Signal to Noise Ratios (SNR) or data gaps. In this study, we developed the Empirically Aggregated Template (EAT) concept. An EAT is a type of Master Event built using the seismic traces with the best SNR at each sensor, based on a set of events that exhibit high waveform similarity, and which are spatially close to one another. Thus, an EAT event will present the highest possible SNR of the database, and is not affected by data gaps. The efficiency and quality of this methodology has been tested by comparing with a set of manually picked events. The picking accuracy, location error, and travel-time residuals demonstrate similarities between manually and EAT picked events and allow us to validate this method. Finally, we have highlighted the advantages and improved results obtained using an EAT compared to a standard Master Event.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202131051
2021-03-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cornet, F. H., Helm, J., Poitrenaud, H., and Etchecopar, A.
    [1997]. Seismic and Aseismic Slips Induced by Large-scale Fluid Injections. In S.Talebi (Ed.), Seismicity Associated with Mines, Reservoirs and Fluid Injections (pp. 563–583). Basel: Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8814-1_12.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuenot, N., Dorbath, C., and Dorbath, L.
    [2008]. Analysis of the Microseismicity Induced by Fluid Injections at the EGS Site of Soultz-sous-Forêts (Alsace, France): Implications for the Characterization of the Geothermal Reservoir Properties.Pure and Applied Geophysics, 165(5), 797–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-008-0335-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ellsworth, W. L.
    [2013]. Injection-Induced Earthquakes.Science, 341(6142).https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225942.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibbons, S. J., and Ringdal, F.
    [2006]. The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation.Geophysical Journal International, 165(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02865.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goertz-Allmann, B. P., Gibbons, S. J., Oye, V., Bauer, R., and Will, R.
    [2017]. Characterization of induced seismicity patterns derived from internal structure in event clusters.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122(5), 3875–3894. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013731.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gudhnason, E. Á.
    [2014]. Analysis of seismic activity on the western part of the Reykjanes Peninsula, SW Iceland, December 2008-May 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ross, Z. E., and Ben-Zion, Y.
    [2014]. Automatic picking of direct P, S seismic phases and fault zone head waves.Geophysical Journal International, 199(1), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu267.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Stuermer, K., Kummerow, J., and Shapiro, S. A.
    [2012]. Multiplet based extraction of geological structures. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012 (pp. 1–5). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202131051
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202131051
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error