1887

Abstract

Summary

The seismic hazard associated to induced seismicity becomes increasingly important as the sites for the exploitation of natural resources, geothermal energy and CO2 injections move closer to urban areas. Successful, reliable and fast detection and earthquake localization methods are a necessity for optimal safety and productivity. The many advances in artificial intelligence in various fields and their capability to apply their learned features to new data in real time is intriguing. We propose to use synthetic earthquake response data modelled using the velocity model and same receiver configuration as in the field to train a convolutional neural network to classify the source to its corresponding 3-D cluster. Once training is completed the network is applied to the corresponding field data. The results show promise that this is indeed feasible as 4 out of 5 events were correctly classified and the missed event was only missed by a little. This method returns a possible cluster inside which the exact hypocenter is located. Therefore, this approach can be used in combination with grid-search type hypocenter location methods to speed up the search by limiting the possible search space.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202131053
2021-03-01
2026-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexandrov, D., Eisner, L., Trojanowski, J., Waheed, U. B., Ebrahim Kaka, S. I. I., and Greenhalgh, S. A.
    [2019] Optimizing detection of microseismic events by receiver selection on surface monitoring.SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 3081–3085.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Eisner, L., Husley, B.J., Duncan, P., Jurick, D., Werner, H. and Keller, W.
    [2010] Comparison of surface and borehole locations of induced seismicity.Geophysical Prospecting, 58, 809–820.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Foulger, G.R., Wilson, M.P., Gluyas, J.G., Julian, B.R., and Davies, R.J.
    [2018] Global review of human-induced earthquakes.Earth-Science Reviews, 178, 438–514.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kennet, B. L. N.
    [2005] ERZSOL3 (Reflectivity method).http://www.quest-itn.org/library/software/reflectivity-method.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kennett, B. L. N.
    [2009] Seismic Waves Propagation in Stratified Media, AnU e Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kingma, D. P., and Ba, J.
    [2015] Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR.San Diego, CA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kriegerowski, M., Petersen, G. M., Vasyura-Bathke, H., and Ohrnberger, M.
    [2019] A deep convolutional neural network for localization of clustered earthquakes based on multistation full waveforms.Seismological Research Letters, 90(2A), 510–516.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G.
    [2015] Deep Learning.nature521(7553), 436–444.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nair, V. and Hinton, G. E.
    [2010] Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines.Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), 807–814.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Perol, T., Gharbi, M., and Denolle, M.
    [2018] Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location.Science Advances, 4(2).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202131053
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202131053
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error