1887

Abstract

Summary

By trapping gas, foam can improve the sweep efficiency in enhanced oil recovery. In this study, to understand gas trapping in fractures, we have conducted experiments in a model fracture with a hydraulic aperture of 80 μm. One wall of the fracture is rough, and the other wall is smooth. The fracture is made of two glass plates and the direct visualization of foam flow inside the fracture is facilitated using a high-speed camera. ImageJ has been used to perform image analysis and quantify the properties of the foam. We find that pre-generated foam has been further refined inside the model. Foam flow reaches local equilibrium, where the rate of bubble generation equals that of bubble destruction, within the model. Foam texture becomes finer and less gas is trapped as the interstitial velocity and pressure gradient increase. Shear-thinning rheology of foam has also been observed. The behavior of gas trapping in our model fracture is different from that in other geological porous media. The fraction of trapped gas is much lower (less than 7%). At the extreme, when velocity increases to 6.8 mm/s (pressure gradient to 1.8 bar/m), all the foam bubbles are flowing and there is no gas trapped inside the fracture.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133018
2021-04-19
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlQuaimi, B.I. and Rossen, W.R.
    [2019] Study of foam generation and propagation in fully characterized physical-model fracture. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 175, 1169–1181.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bird, R., Stewart, W., Lightfoot, E.
    [2002] Transport Phenomena 2nd edition John Wiley and Sons. New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Conn, C.A.
    [2015] The characterization and visualization of multi-phase systems using microfluidic devices (Doctoral dissertation).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernø, M.A., Gauteplass, J., Pancharoen, M., Haugen, Å., Graue, A., Kovscek, A.R., Hirasaki, G.
    [2016] Experimental study of foam generation, sweep efficiency, and flow in a fracture network. SPE Journal, 21(04), 1–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Friedmann, F., Chen, W.H., Gauglitz, P.A.
    [1991] Experimental and simulation study of high-temperature foam displacement in porous media. SPE reservoir engineering, 6(01), 37–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hirasaki, G.J., Miller, C.A., Szafranski, R., Lawson, J.B., Akiya, N.
    [1997] Surfactant/foam process for aquifer remediation. In International symposium on oilfield chemistry.SPE 37257-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones, S.A., Getrouw, N., Vincent-Bonnieu, S.
    [2018] Foam flow in a model porous medium: II. The effect of trapped gas. Soft matter, 14(18), 3497–3503.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kil, R.A., Nguyen, Q.P., Rossen, W.R.
    [2011] Determining trapped gas in foam from computed-tomography images. SPE Journal, 16(01), 24–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim, J., Dong, Y., Rossen, W.R.
    [2005] Steady-state flow behavior of CO2 foam. SPE Journal, 10(04), 405–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kovscek, A.R., Radke, C.J.
    [1994] Fundamentals of foam transport in porous media, in: L. L.Schramm (ed), Foams in the Petroleum Industry, Washington, D.C., Amer. Chem. Soc. 242, 115–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kovscek, A.R., Tretheway, D.C., Persoff, P., Radke, C.J.
    [1995] Foam flow through a transparent rough-walled rock fracture. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 13(2), 75–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lake, L.W., Johns, R.T., Rossen, W.R., Pope, G.A.
    [2014] Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Marchalot, J., Lambert, J., Cantat, I., Tabeling, P., Jullien, M.C.
    [2008] 2D foam coarsening in a microfluidic system. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 83(6), 64006.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nguyen, Q.P., Rossen, W.R., Zitha, P.L., Currie, P.K.
    [2009] Determination of gas trapping with foam using X-ray computed tomography and effluent analysis. SPE Journal, 14(02), 222–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Portois, C., Essouayed, E., Annable, M.D., Guiserix, N., Joubert, A., Atteia, O.
    [2018] Field demonstration of foam injection to confine a chlorinated solvent source zone. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 214, 16–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Radke, C.J., Gillis, J.V.
    [1990] A dual tracer technique for determining trapped gas saturation during steady foam flow in porous media. Paper SPE 20519 presented at the 65th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans. In Tech. Conf. Exhib., New Orleans, LA.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rossen, W.R.
    [1996] Foams in enhanced oil recovery. Foams: theory, measurements and applications, 57, 413–464.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tang, G.Q., Kovscek, A.R.
    [2006] Trapped gas fraction during steady-state foam flow. Transport in porous media, 65(2), 287–307.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Thompson, K.E., Gdanski, R.D.
    [1993] Laboratory study provides guidelines for diverting acid with foam. SPE Production & Facilities, 8(04), 285–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Witherspoon, P.A., Wang, J.S., Iwai, K., Gale, J.E.
    [1980] Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water resources research, 16(6), 1016–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133018
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133018
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error