1887

Abstract

Summary

New polymer based EOR schemes are proposed to increase sweep efficiency and oil recovery from high temperature and high salinity carbonate reservoirs in Abu Dhabi. These reservoirs generally consists of two main geological zones, i.e., an Upper zone and a Lower zone with permeability contrast of up two orders of magnitude. The new EOR concepts rely on keeping the upper zone pressurized by continuous polymer injection and simultaneously injecting miscible gas or water into the lower zone. A lateral pressure gradient is maintained in the upper zone, providing gas or water confinement in the lower zone and improving sweep efficiency.

Accordingly, a comprehensive de-risking program for the new polymer based EOR schemes was initiated which includes an extensive laboratory experimental program and field injectivity test to ensure that the identified polymer can be injected in the target formation below fracture pressure. The comprehensive experimental program and results were described in an earlier publication ( ) and the field injectivity test was also described by .

The polymer injectivity test (PIT) consists of three main phases: water injection baseline, polymer injection with different rates and different polymer concentrations and chase water injection. The objective of this paper is to present the interpretation of the polymer injectivity test using a single well radial model. This PIT is the world first polymer injectivity test in carbonate under such harsh conditions and the polymer used in this test has never been field tested before. The model was built to integrate and assess the dynamic data collected during the PIT, incorporating laboratory experiments, and evaluating the impact of different parameters on the near-wellbore injectivity behavior.

Interpretation of the PIT using a radial simulation model allowed to confirm that the qualified polymer can be injected and propagated in the extremely harsh conditions carbonate reservoirs, below fracture pressure and without well plugging. Despite the uncertainties and operational complexities presented during the PIT, a representative history match was obtained. More than 20 thousand sensitivity simulation runs were performed through a robust iterative optimization history match method. This workflow helped to address multiple uncertainties and captured many possible scenarios and validated laboratory parameters such as polymer bulk viscosity, in-situ rheology, RRF, adsorption, etc. The results of the PIT interpretation will be further utilized in the sector model and full field simulation models to investigate and design multi-well EOR pilots and full field development plans.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133038
2021-04-19
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Computer Modeling Group Ltd, CMG.
    Computer Modeling Group Ltd, CMG. [2019]. CMOST AI user guide 2019.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Delamaide, E.
    [2019]. How to Use Analytical Tools to Forecast Injectivity in Polymer Floods.SPE Europec featured at 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition London, England, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Green, D., & Willhite, G.
    [1998]. Enhanced Oil Recovery, SPE Textbook Series Vol. 6. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, D., Beckner, B.
    [1999]. A Practical and Efficient Uplayering Method for Scale-Up of Multimillion-Cell Geologic Models.SPE Asia Pacific Improved Oil Recovery Conference, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/57273-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Masalmeh, S.
    , K. LingliWei, H.Hillgartner, R.Al-Mjeni, C.Blom. [2012]. Developing High Resolution Static and Dynamic Models for Waterflood History Matching and EOR Evaluation of a Middle Eastern Carbonate Reservoir, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/161485-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Masalmeh, S.K., Wei, L., Blom, C.P.A., Jing, X.D
    (2014). EOR Options for Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoirs Currently Under Waterflooding.SPE-171900-MS, presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 10–13 November 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Masalmeh, Shehadeh, AlSumaiti, Ali, Gaillard, Nicolas, Daguerre, Frederic, Skauge, Tormod
    , and ArneSkuage. [2019]. Extending Polymer Flooding Towards High-Temperature and High-Salinity Carbonate Reservoirs.Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/197647-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MohammadLotfollahi; RouhiFarajzadeh; MojdehDelshad; Al-KhalilAl-Abri; BartM. Wassing; RifaatAl-Mjeni; KamranAwan; PavelBedrikovetsky
    . [2016] Mechanistic Simulation of Polymer Injectivity in Field Tests SPE J.21(04): 1178–1191. https://doi.org/10.2118/174665-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lake, L.
    [2010]. Enhanced Oil Recovery. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, Z., Delshad, M.
    [2014]. Development of an Analytical Injectivity Model for Non-Newtonian Polymer Solutions.SPE Journal, 19(03), 381–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/163672-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Poulsen, A., Shook, G., Ruby, N., Charvin, K., Dwarakanath, V., Thach, S., & Ellis, M.
    [2018]. Results of the UK Captain Field Interwell EOR Pilot.SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. R. V.Rachapudi, S. S.Alshehhi, Ahmed A.BinAmro, S. K.Masalmeh, A.Dey, S. M. AlNuimi, M. M.Kenawy, C.Fabbri, C.Romero, S.Xu, M.Mabrook, O. F.Garnier, K.Wang, S.Jouenne, P.Cordelier, GuillaumeDupuis
    . [2020] World First Polymer Injectivity Test in High Salinity and High Temperature Carbonate Reservoir, Case Study from a Giant Reservoir in UAE. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/203405-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sharma, A., Delshad, M., Huh, C. et al.
    [2014] A Practical Method to Calculate Polymer Viscosity Accurately in Numerical Reservoir Simulators.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/147239-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133038
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133038
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error