1887

Abstract

Summary

Modified salinity water (MSW) flooding is shown to be more effective at higher temperatures in the coreflooding tests from the chalk reservoirs. The improvement of oil production that is widely linked to wettability alteration is determined by the physicochemical interaction between potential determining ions (PDIs) in the MSW and formation water, rock surface chemistry, and crude oil components, mostly organic polar groups. These interactions can be described by the chemical reactions between the ionic species in the aqueous phase and at the water-rock and water-oil interfaces. The chemical equilibrium between these species is shown, e.g., zeta potential measurements of the chalk particles, to be heavily affected by temperature change. A large number of chemical reactions, however, makes it increasingly difficult to predict the effect of temperature on the outcome of MSW flooding since each chemical equilibrium responds differently to the change of temperature depending on the enthalpy of reaction. In chalk cores, oil recovery is improved at higher temperatures in the presence of PDIs. This has led to the view that seawater or MSW is more efficient at higher temperatures (notably higher than 70°C).

This study aims to develop a mechanistic model that can systematically and quantitatively reproduce the observed laboratory link between increasing temperature and improved oil recovery. The reactions enthalpies of the chalk surface are inferred from the work of Bonto et al. Then, we include the temperature dependence of viscosity, the dissolution of chalk, and precipitation of minerals, e.g., anhydrite. We couple the PHREEQC geochemistry package with an inhouse finite volume solver for our geochemical and nonisothermal multicomponent multiphase transport calculations. The link between the geochemistry and multiphase transport properties is established through the available adsorption sites.

We first validate the model using inhouse and literature core flooding data, with the transport parameters obtained from the work of Ciriaco et al. at different temperatures. Then we apply the model to a 2D domain that resembles a North Sea chalk field in which cold seawater is being injected. We show that the results match qualitatively with the field data demonstrating the capabilities of our improved model.

1. Bonto, M., Eftekhari, A.A., Nick, H.: Analysis of the temperature impact on the calcite surface reactivity in modified salinity water applications. Abstract submitted to EAGE IOR, 2021

2. Ciriaco, H.M., Eftekhari, A.A., Nick, H.: Estimating two-phase reactive flow model parameters from single-and two-phase modified-salinity core flooding data. Abstract submitted to EAGE IOR, 2021

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133055
2021-04-19
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alameri, W., Teklu, T. W., Graves, R. M., Kazemi, H., & AlSumaiti, A. M.
    (2014). Wettability alteration during low-salinity water-flooding in carbonate reservoir cores. In Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, APOGCE 2014 - Changing the Game: Opportunities, Challenges and Solutions (Vol. 2, pp. 1199–1216). Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/171529-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austad, T., Strand, S., Høgnesen, E. J., & Zhang, P.
    (2005). Seawater as IOR Fluid in Fractured Chalk. In SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/93000-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Austad, T., Shariatpanahi, S. F., Strand, S., Black, C. J. J., & Webb, K. J.
    (2012). Conditions for a low-salinity Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) effect in carbonate oil reservoirs.Energy and Fuels, 26(1), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef201435g
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonto, Maria, Eftekhari, A. A., & Nick, H.
    (2019). A calibrated model for the carbonate-brine-crude oil surface chemistry and its effect on the rock wettability, dissolution, and mechanical properties. In Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference 2019, RSC 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/193865-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonto, María, Eftekhari, A. A., & M. Nick, H.
    (2020). A wettability indicator parameter based on the thermodynamic modelling of chalk-oil-brine systems.Energy & Fuels.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00716
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonto, María, Nick, H., & Eftekhari, A. A.
    (2021). Analysis of the temperature impact on the calcite surface reactivity in modified salinity water applications. In Abstract submitted to EAGE IOR.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chakravarty, K. H., Fosbøl, P. L., & Thomsen, K.
    (2015). Interactions of fines with base fractions of oil and its implication in smart water flooding. In EUROPEC 2015 (pp. 537–556). Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/174335-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Derkani, M., Fletcher, A., Abdallah, W., Sauerer, B., Anderson, J., & Zhang, Z.
    (2018). Low Salinity Waterflooding in Carbonate Reservoirs: Review of Interfacial Mechanisms.Colloids and Interfaces, 2(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids2020020
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Evje, S., & Hiorth, A.
    (2010). A Mathematical model for dynamic wettability alteration controlled by water-rock chemistry.Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 5(2), 217–256. https://doi.org/10.3934/nhm.2010.5.217
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fathi, S. J., Austad, T., & Strand, S.
    (2010). “smart water” as a wettability modifier in chalk: The effect of salinity and ionic composition. In Energy and Fuels (Vol. 24, pp. 2514–2519). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901304m
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gachuz-Muro, H., & Sohrabi, M.
    (2013). Effects of brine on crude oil viscosity at different temperature and brine composition - Heavy oil/water interaction. In 75th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition 2013 Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013: Changing Frontiers (pp. 1878–1889). European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, EAGE. https://doi.org/10.2118/164910-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia-Olvera, G., Reilly, T. M., Lehmann, T. E., & Alvarado, V.
    (2016). Effects of asphaltenes and organic acids on crude oil-brine interfacial visco-elasticity and oil recovery in low-salinity waterflooding.Fuel, 185, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.104
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hamouda, Aly A., & Gupta, S.
    (2017). Enhancing oil recovery from chalk reservoirs by a low-salinity water flooding mechanism and fluid/rock interactions.Energies, 10(4), 576. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10040576
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hamouda, Aly Anis
    , & Gomari, K. A. R. (2006). Influence of temperature on wettability alteration of carbonate reservoirs. In Proceedings - SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery (Vol. 2, pp. 848–859). Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2523/99848-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jerauld, G. R., Lin, C. Y., Webb, K. J., & Seccombe, J. C.
    (2008). Modeling Low-Salinity Waterflooding, (December), 24–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2118/102239-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kadeethum, T., Nick, H. M., Lee, S., & Ballarin, F.
    (2021). Enriched Galerkin discretization for modeling poroelasticity and permeability alteration in heterogeneous porous media.Journal of Computational Physics, 427, 110030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110030
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lager, A., Webb, K. J., Black, C. J. J., Singleton, M., & Sorbie, K. S.
    (2008). Low salinity oil recovery - An experimental investigation. In Petrophysics (Vol. 49, pp. 28–35). Retrieved from https://www.onepetro.org/journal-paper/SPWLA-2008-v49n1a2
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ligthelm, D., Gronsveld, J., Hofman, J., Brussee, N., Marcelis, F., & Van Der Linde, H.
    (2009). Novel waterflooding strategy by manipulation of injection brine composition (SPE-119835).71st European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition 2009: Balancing Global Resources. Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2009, 2(Figure 1), 1313–1335. https://doi.org/10.2118/119835-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Loahardjo, N., Xie, X., Yin, P., & Morrow, N. R.
    (2007). Low Salinity Waterflooding of a Reservoir.Scoiety of Core Analysts, 29.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mahani, H., Keya, A. L., Berg, S., Bartels, W. B., Nasralla, R., & Rossen, W. R.
    (2015). Insights into the mechanism of wettability alteration by low-salinity flooding (LSF) in carbonates.Energy and Fuels, 29(3), 1352–1367. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef5023847
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nasralla, R. A., & Nasr-El-Din, H. A.
    (2014). Double-layer expansion: Is it a primary mechanism of improved oil recovery by low-salinity waterflooding?SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 17(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.2118/154334-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nermoen, A., Korsnes, R. I., Storm, E. V., Stødle, T., Madland, M. V., & Fabricius, I. L.
    (2018). Incorporating electrostatic effects into the effective stress relation - Insights from chalk experiments.Geophysics, 83(3), MR123–MR135. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0607.1
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rezaeidoust, A., Puntervold, T., Strand, S., & Austad, T.
    (2009). Smart water as wettability modifier in carbonate and sandstone: A discussion of similarities/differences in the chemical mechanisms.Energy and Fuels, 23(9), 4479–4485. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900185q
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Shehata, A. M., Alotaibi, M. B., & Nasr-El-Din, H. A.
    (2014). Waterflooding in carbonate reservoirs: Does the salinity matter.SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 17(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.2118/170254-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Strand, S., Standnes, D. C., & Austad, T.
    (2006). New wettability test for chalk based on chromatographic separation of SCN- and SO42-.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 52(1–4), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PETROL.2006.03.021
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Taheri, M., Bonto, M., Eftekhari, A., Piñerez Torrijos, I. D., Puntervold, T., Strand, S., & Maghami Nick, H.
    (2019). Analyzing the Smart Water Core-flooding Data in Carbonates by Modelling the Oil Breakthrough Time Using a Novel Reactive Transport Model. In IOR 2019 – 20th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Le Palais Beaumont in Pau: EAGE. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900071
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Taheriotaghsara, M., Bonto, M., Eftekhari, A. A., & Nick, H. M.
    (2020). Prediction of oil breakthrough time in modified salinity water flooding in carbonate cores.Fuel, 274(xxxx). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117806
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Taheriotaghsara, M., Hosseinzadehsadati, S., & Nick, H. M.
    (2020). The Impact of Spatially Correlated Heterogeneity and Adsorption on Modified Salinity Water in Carbonates.ACS Omega, acsomega.0c03679. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03679
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Webb, K. J., Black, C. J. J., & Al-Ajeel, H.
    (2003). Low Salinity Oil Recovery - Log-Inject-Log. In Middle East Oil Show. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/81460-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Yousef, A. A., Al-Saleh, S., Al-Kaabi, A., Al-Jawfi, M., & Aramco, S.
    (2010). CSUG/SPE 137634 Laboratory Investigation of Novel Oil Recovery Method for Carbonate Reservoirs. Retrieved from https://www.onepetro.org/download/conference-paper/SPE-137634-MS?id=conference-paper%2FSPE-137634-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Yousef, A. A., Al-Salehsalah, S. H., & Al-Jawfi, M. S.
    (2011). New Recovery Method for Carbonate Reservoirs through Tuning the Injection Water Salinity: Smart WaterFlooding.https://doi.org/10.2118/143550-ms
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zahid, A.
    (2011). Smart Waterflooding in Carbonate Reservoirs.Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2800–2800.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, P., & Austad, T.
    (2006). Wettability and oil recovery from carbonates: Effects of temperature and potential determining ions.Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 279(1–3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.01.009
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, P., Tweheyo, M. T., & Austad, T.
    (2006). Wettability alteration and improved oil recovery in chalk: The effect of calcium in the presence of sulfate.Energy and Fuels, 20(5), 2056–2062. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0600816
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2007). Wettability alteration and improved oil recovery by spontaneous imbibition of seawater into chalk: Impact of the potential determining ions Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42−.Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 301(1–3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.058
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133055
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133055
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error