1887

Abstract

Summary

This paper presents a detailed investigation into compositional flow in solvent-assisted steam-assisted gravity drainage (SA-SAGD) with multicomponent hydrocarbon solvent “condensate”, which is readily available near thermal operation sites. Designing SA-SAGD with condensate requires understanding the complex interplay between phase behavior and fluid flow that affects bitumen production and solvent recovery.

This research consisted of three stages. First, an SA-SAGD experiment was performed using a cylindrical physical model with an inner diameter of 0.45 m and a length of 1.2 m. Steam and synthetic condensate (2.7 mol%) were coinjected at 3500 kPa. Second, the experimental data were history-matched by using a numerical model, and the resulting model was analyzed for the detailed analysis of solvent flow behavior. Third, observations of compositional details in the SA-SAGD experiment were further investigated with a simulation case study using stochastic realizations of a 3-D heterogeneous reservoir. We present a novel way of analyzing how much of the injected solvent was used for in-situ bitumen dilution beyond the edge of an SA-SAGD chamber, which is referred to as “utilization factor” in this paper. Solvent utilization factor is related to, but different from solvent recovery factor because different components have different volatilities in the coinjected condensate.

SA-SAGD experimental results showed that the produced condensate was heavier than the injected. Material balance analysis showed that the in-situ condensate composition for bitumen dilution was similar to the injected condensate composition, but the volatile components (C1 and C4) had lower recovery factors. The simulation case study for an upscaled 3-D heterogeneous reservoir confirmed that a large fraction of the volatile solvents in the condensate was used for in-situ bitumen dilution. The solvent recovery factor that has been used as an economic indicator for SA-SAGD does not represent how much of the injected solvent is used for in-situ bitumen dilution.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133152
2021-04-19
2025-11-17

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133152
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Murayri, M.T., Maini, B.B., Harding, T.G. and Oskouei, J.
    2016a. Cracked Naphtha Coinjection in Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. Energy & Fuels30 (7): 5330–5340. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02773
     https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02773 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2016b. Multicomponent Solvent Co-injection with Steam in Heavy and Extra-Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Energy & Fuels30 (4): 2604–2616. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02774
     https://doi.org/10.1021 /acs.energyfuels.5b02774 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayodele, O.R., Nasr, T.N., Beaulieu, G. and Heck, G.
    2009. Laboratory Experimental Testing and Development of an Efficient Low Pressure ES-SAGD Process. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology48 (09): 54–61. https://doi.org/10.2118/09‑09‑54
     https://doi.org/10.2118/09-09-54 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baek, K.., Argüelles-Vivas, F.J., Okuno, R., Sheng, K.., Sharma, H. and Weerasooriya, U.P.
    2018a. An Experimental Study of Emulsion Phase Behavior and Viscosity for Athabasca-Bitumen/Diethylamine/Brine Mixtures. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering22 (02): 628–641 https://doi.org/10.2118/189768‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/189768-PA [Google Scholar]
  5. Baek, K.H, Argüelles-Vivas, F., Okuno, R., Sheng, K., Sharma, H., and Weerasooriya, U.P.
    , 2018b. Emulsification of Athabasca Bitumen by Organic Alkali: Emulsion Phase Behavior and Viscosity for Athabasca-Bitumen/Brine/Triethylenetetramine. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering168: 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.04.063
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.04.063 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baek, K.H., OkunoR., Sharma, H. and Weerasooriya, U.P.
    2019. Oil-in-Water Emulsification of Athabasca Bitumen with Pyrrolidine Solution. Fuel246: 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/ifuel.2019.02.123
     https://doi.org/10.1016/ifuel.2019.02.123 [Google Scholar]
  7. Computer Modelling Group
    Computer Modelling Group, 2018. STARS Version 2018 User’s Guide. Computer Modelling Group, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Deng, X., Huang, H., Zhao, L., Law, D.S. and Nasr, T.N.
    2010. Simulating the ES-SAGD Process with Solvent Mixture in Athabasca Reservoirs. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology49 (01): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.2118/132488‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/132488-PA [Google Scholar]
  9. Eppelbaum, L., Kutasov, I. and Pilchin, A.
    2014. Thermal Properties of Rocks and Density of Fluids. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gates, I. D.
    , 2007. Oil Phase Viscosity Behavior in Expanding-Solvent Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering59 (1–2): 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.petrol.2007.03.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/i.petrol.2007.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  11. Govind, P.A., Das, S.K., Srinivasan, S. and Wheeler, T.J.
    2008. Expanding Solvent SAGD in Heavy Oil Reservoirs. In International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/117571‑MS
     https://doi.org/10.2118/117571-MS [Google Scholar]
  12. Gupta, S. C. and Gittins, S. D.
    2006. Christina Lake Solvent Aided Process Pilot. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology45 (9): 15–18. https://doi.org/10.2118/2005‑190
     https://doi.org/10.2118/2005-190 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta, S., Gittins, S. and Picherack, P.
    2005. Field Implementation of Solvent Aided Process. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology44 (11): 8–13. https://doi.org/10.2118/05‑11‑TN1 INTERSECT version 2018.1. Schlumberger.
     https://doi.org/10.2118/05-11-TN1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ivory, J.J., Zheng, R., Nasr, T.N., Deng, X., Beaulieu, G. and Heck, G.
    2008. Investigation of Low Pressure ES-SAGD. In International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/117759‑MS
     https://doi.org/10.2118/117759-MS [Google Scholar]
  15. Jha, R.K., Kumar, M., Benson, I. and Hanzlik, E.
    2013. New Insights into Steam/Solvent-Coinjection-Process Mechanism. SPE Journal18 (05): 867–877. https://doi.org/10.2118/159277‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/159277-PA [Google Scholar]
  16. Keshavarz, M., Okuno, R. and Babadagli, T.
    2014. Efficient Oil Displacement Near the Chamber Edge in ES-SAGD. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering118: 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2015. Optimal Application Conditions for Steam/Solvent Coinjection. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering18 (01): 20–38. SPE-165471-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/165471‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/165471-PA [Google Scholar]
  18. Khaledi, R.R., Beckman, M.S., Pustanyk, K., Mohan, A., Wattenbarger, C.C., Dickson, J.L. and Boone, T.T.
    2012. Physical Modeling of Solvent-Assisted SAGD. In SPE Heavy Oil Conference Canada. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/150676‑MS
     https://doi.org/10.2118/150676-MS [Google Scholar]
  19. Khaledi, R.R., Boone, T.J., Motahhari, H.R. and Subramanian, G.
    2015. Optimized Solvent for Solvent Assisted-Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SA-SAGD) Recovery Process. In SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/174429‑MS
     https://doi.org/10.2118/174429-MS [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar, A. and Okuno, R.
    2016. A New Algorithm for Multiphase-Fluid Characterization for Solvent Injection. SPE Journal21 (05): 1688–1704. https://doi.org/10.2118/175123‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/175123-PA [Google Scholar]
  21. Leaute, R.P.
    , 2002. Liquid Addition to Steam for Enhancing Recovery of Bitumen with CSS: Evolution of Technology from Research Concept to a Field Pilot at Cold Lake. Presented at the SPE/Petroleum Society of CIM/CHOA Paper Number 79011, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 4–7. https://doi.org/10.2118/79011‑MS
     https://doi.org/10.2118/79011-MS [Google Scholar]
  22. Leaute, R.P. and Carey, B.S.
    2007. Liquid Addition to Steam for Enhancing Recovery (LASER) of Bitumen with CSS: Results from the First Pilot Cycle. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology46 (9): 22–30. https://doi.org/10.2118/2005‑161
     https://doi.org/10.2118/2005-161 [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, W., Mamora, D. and Li, Y.
    2011a. Light- and Heavy-Solvent Impacts on Solvent-Aided-SAGD Process: a Low-Pressure Experimental Study. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology50 (04): 19–30. https://doi.org/10.2118/133277‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/133277-PA [Google Scholar]
  24. Li.W., Mamora, D. D., Li, Y.
    , 2011b. Solvent-Type and–Rratio Impacts on Solvent-aided SAGD Process. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering14 (03): 320–331. https://doi.org/10.2118/130802‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/130802-PA [Google Scholar]
  25. McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd
    McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd., 2018. SAGD Production Summary and Project Comparison.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Musial, G., Labourdette, R., Franco, J. and Reynaud, J.Y.
    2013. Modeling of a Tide-Influenced Point-Bar Heterogeneity Distribution and Impacts on Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Production: Example from Steepbank River, McMurray Formation, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1306/13371593St643561
     https://doi.org/10.1306/13371593St643561 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nasr, T. N., Beaulieu, G., Golbeck, H., Heck, G.
    2003. Novel Expanding Solvent-SAGD Process “ES-SAGD”. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology42 (1): 13–16. https://doi.org/10.2118/03‑01‑TN
     https://doi.org/10.2118/03-01-TN [Google Scholar]
  28. Robinson, D.B. and Peng, DY.
    1978. The Characterization of the Heptanes and Heavier Fractions for the GPA Peng-Robinson Programs. Gas Processors Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Shen, C.
    2013. Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Case Studies. 1st Edition. Chapter 13, 413–455, Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Sheng, K., Okuno, R., and Wang, M.
    2018. Dimethyl Ether as an Additive to Steam for Improved Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. SPE Journal23 (04): 1201–1222. https://doi.org/10.2118/184983‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/184983-PA [Google Scholar]
  31. Sheng, K., Argüelles-Vivas, F.J., Baek, K.H. and Okuno, R.
    2019. An Experimental Study of Emulsion Flow in Alkaline/Solvent Coinjection with Steam for Heavy-Oil/Bitumen Recovery. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering23 (02): 402–413. https://doi.org/10.2118/190224‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/190224-PA [Google Scholar]
  32. Sheng, K., Okuno, R., Imran, M. and Yamada, T.
    2020. An Experimental Study of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. SPE Journal. https://doi.org/10.2118/200867‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/200867-PA [Google Scholar]
  33. Sheng, K., Okuno, R., Imran, M., Nakutnyy, P. and Nakagawa, K.
    2021. An Experimental Study of Steam-solvent Coinjection for Bitumen Recovery Using a Large-scale Physical Model. SPE Europec featured at 82nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Madrid, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Venkatramani, A. and Okuno, R.
    2017. Compositional Mechanisms in Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage and Expanding-Solvent Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage with Consideration of Water Solubility in Oil. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering20 (03): 681–697. https://doi.org/10.2118/180737‑PA
     https://doi.org/10.2118/180737-PA [Google Scholar]
  35. 2018a. Mechanistic Simulation Study of Expanding-Solvent Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage under Reservoir Heterogeneity. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 169: 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.04.074
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.04.074 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2018b. Steam-Oil Ratio in Steam-Solvent Coinjection Simulation for Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Bitumen Reservoirs. Journal of Energy Resources Technology140 (11): 112903–112903-17. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040529
     https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040529 [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133152
Loading
An Experimental Study of Steam-Solvent Coinjection for Bitumen Recovery Using a Large-Scale Physical Model
Conference Proceedings 2021, 1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202133152
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133152
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202133152
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error