1887

Abstract

Summary

We here present original results acquired through a simple setup that allows obtaining molecular explanations of the mathematical deconvolution of Rock-Eval S2 pyrograms. This approach provides clues to the intimate nature of organic matter and bridges a gap between bulk and molecular information.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202134022
2021-09-12
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2021/imog-2021/Jacob_et_al_-_IMOG_2021_-_Rock-Eval_V2-22-35-Jacob-Jeremy.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202134022&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Disnar et al.
    , 2003. Soil organic matter (SOM) characterization by Rock-Eval® pyrolysis: scope and limitations.Org. Geochem.34, 327–343.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hedges et al.
    , 2000. The molecularly-uncharacterized component of nonliving organic matter in natural environments.Org. Geochem.31, 945–958.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Schulten and Schnitzer, M.
    , 1993. Temperature-resolved in-source pyrolysis-soft ionization mass spectrometry of soil humic acids.Org. Geochem20, 17–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sebag et al.
    , 2006. Monitoring organic matter dynamics in soil profiles by ‘Rock-Eval® pyrolysis’: bulk characterization and quantification of degradation.Eur. J. Soil Sci.57, 344–355.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202134022
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error