1887

Abstract

Summary

The efficiency of oil production is influenced by various factors, the main of which are the reservoir properties of oil-bearing formations - porosity and permeability. Porosity determines the storage capacity and permeability determines the filtration ability. Reservoir properties generally depend on the type of reservoir, the particle size of the reservoir rock, the presence of clay particles, etc. However, the formation depth has the greatest influence on the reservoir properties. For all types of rocks, permeability and porosity decrease with the bedding depth increasing. The volume of the pore space and the permeability of rocks also depends on the effective pressure. In this work, on the example of the northern Perm Region oil fields, confined to layers of the same geological age, the influence of the layer’s geological characteristics on their reservoir properties is assessed. When analyzing the reservoir properties of 40 oil layers, equations that describe the influence of the depth and effective pressure on the reservoir properties of oil layers were obtained. Analytical dependences of the influence of porosity on the permeability of rocks are also obtained.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202150044
2021-03-22
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. FischerG., PatersonM.
    (1992). Chapter 9 Measurement of Permeability and Storage Capacity in Rocks During Deformation at High Temperature and Pressure. In Fault mechanics and transport properties of rocks. Vol. 51, pp. 213–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074‑6142(08)62824‑7.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(08)62824-7 [Google Scholar]
  2. SigalR.F.
    (2002). The pressure dependence of permeability. (2002). Petrophysics : the SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description., 43(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/info:doi/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rutqvist, J., Stephansson, O.
    (2003). The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeology Journal., 11(1), 7–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040‑002‑0241‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-002-0241-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. AnselmettiF.S., LuthiS., EberliG.P.
    (1998). Quantitative characterization of carbonate pore systems by digital image analysis. AAPG Bulletin., 82(10), 1815–1836.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bjorlykke, K., Hoeg, K.
    (1997). Effects of burial diagenesis on stresses, compaction and fluid flow in sedimentary basins. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 14(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264‑8172(96)00051‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(96)00051-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bjorlykke, K.
    (1993). Fluid flow in sedimentary basins. Sedimentary Geology, 86(1-2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037‑0738(93)90137‑T
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(93)90137-T [Google Scholar]
  7. Woody et al.
    (1996). Effect of texture on petrophysical properties of dolomite: Evidence from the Cambrian-Ordovician of southeastern Missouri // AAPG Bulletin, V. 80, No. 1, P. 119–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. EhrenbergS., NadeauP.
    (2005). Sandstone vs. carbonate petroleum reservoirs: A global perspective on porosity-depth and porosity-permeability relationships. AAPG Bulletin., 89(4), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1306/11230404071.
    https://doi.org/10.1306/11230404071 [Google Scholar]
  9. WarrenJ.
    (2000). Dolomite: occurrence, evolution and economically important associations. Earth-Science Reviews., 52(1–3), 1–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012‑8252(00)00022‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00022-2 [Google Scholar]
  10. RutqvistJ., StephanssonO.
    10. (2003). The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeology Journal., 11(1), 7–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040‑002‑0241‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-002-0241-5 [Google Scholar]
  11. BlochS., LanderR.H., BonnellL.
    11. (2002). Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs: Origin and predictability. AAPG Bulletin., 86(2), 301 -328. DOI: 10.1306/61eedabc‑173e‑11d7‑8645000102c1865d
    https://doi.org/10.1306/61eedabc-173e-11d7-8645000102c1865d [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202150044
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202150044
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error