1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. EAGE/SPE Workshop on Shale Science 2021
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

The new experimental geothermal investigations of hydrocarbon systems of the Bazhenov and Domanik Formations are necessary for basin modeling as previous heat flow data have serious errors caused by drawbacks of traditional methods used for experiments. Two wells drilled in the Bazhenov and Domanik Formations (depth of 3202 and 3827 m correspondingly) were studied with advanced techniques that included the method of thermal core logging for thermal properties determination for 4102 and 1699 core samples correspondingly and a new method of thermal property prediction from standard well-logging data for intervals without coring. The measurements were also performed on as-received, dry and brine-saturated core plugs and in-situ conditions. Influence of technological fissuring was accounted for from variations in thermal conductivity components for different states of core plugs. The equivalent thermal conductivity was determined for different depth intervals taking estimated influence of anisotropy and PT-corrections into account. Detailed data on equilibrium temperature gradient along the wells were used. Essential vertical variations in heat flow along the wells were registered (by 55 and 25% correspondingly) and the terrestrial heat flow values were determined (87.1 and 74.4 W/(mK) correspondingly) that exceed significantly (by 65 and 120%) the averaged data published previously for these territories.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202151027
2021-04-05
2024-04-18

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202151027
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1.Golovanova, I.V. [2005] Thermal field of the Southern Urals. Nauka, Moscow. (in Russian)
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.Gordienko, V.V., Zavgorodskaya, O.V., Moiseenko, U.I. [1987] Heat flow map of the territory of the USSR. Scale 1: 5,000,000. Explanatory note. (in Russian)
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.Duchkov, A.D., Sokolova, L.S., Ayunov, D.E., Zlobina, O.N. [2013] Thermal conductivity of sediments in high-latitude West Siberia.Russian Geology and Geophysics, 54, 1522–1528.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.Kurchikov, A.R., Stavitski, B.P. [1987] Geothermy of oil and gas bearing areas of Western Siberia. Moscow: Nedra. (in Russian)
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.Chekhonin, E., Popov, Y., Peshkov, G., Spasennykh, M., Popov, E., Romushkevich, R. [2020] On the importance of rock thermal conductivity and heat flow density in basin and petroleum system modelling.Basin Research, 32(5), 1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12427.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.Emmerman, R., Lauterjung, J. [1997] The German continental deep drilling program KTB: Overview and major results.Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(B8), 18179–18201.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.Handbook on Terrestrial Heat Flow Density Determination [1988] Eds. HaenelR., StegenaL., RybachL. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 486 p.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.Kukkonen, T., Rath, V., Kivekas, L., Šafanda, J., Čermak, V. [2011] Geothermal studies of the Outokumpu Deep Drill Hole, Finland: Vertical variation in heat flow and palaeoclimatic implications.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 188, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2011.06.002.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.Popov, Y. [2012] Evolution in the reliability of experimental geothermal data. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Australian Geothermal Energy Conference. Edited by C.Huddlestone-Holmes and E.Gerner. Sydney, Australia, Geoscience Australia Record 2012/73, GeoCat 74874, 138–146.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.Popov, E., Goncharov, A., Popov, Yu., Spasennykh, M., Chekhonin, E., Shakirov, A., Gabova, A. [2019]. Advanced techniques for determining thermal properties on rock samples and cuttings and indirect estimating for atmospheric and formation conditions.IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 367(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/367/1/012017.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.Popov, Y., Pimenov, V., Pevzner, L., Romushkevich, R., Popov, E. [1998] Geothermal characteristics of the Vorotilovo deep borehole drilled into the Puchezh-Katunk impact structure.Tectonophysics,291, 205–223.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.Shakirov, A., Chekhonin, E., Popov, Yu., Popov, E., Spasennykh, M., Zagranovskaya, D., Serkin, M. [2021] Rock thermal properties from well-logging data accounting for thermal anisotropy.Geothermics, 92,102059, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102059.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202151027
Loading
New Data on Heat flow for Modeling Areas of Hydrocarbon Systems of The Bazhenov and Domanik Formations
Conference Proceedings 2021, 1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202151027
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202151027
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202151027
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error