1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Magnetic method is effective, rapid, and cheap technology in the geophysical studying of hydrocarbon fields. The present study related to the investigation of the Rubaniv gas field in the Outer zone of the Carpathian Foredeep. Our previous results demonstrated the close dependence of the local anomalous magnetic field upon gas deposit of Rubaniv field, soil magnetic susceptibility of the genetic horizons, and possible gas microseepage. New results are concentrated in magnetic mineralogy of soils from the areas of hydrocarbons impact as well as natural patches. The genesis of soil mineral magnetism deals with iron oxides, hydroxides, and sulphides. We identified natural magnetite, hematite, goethite, maghemite and paramagnetics formation in both soils from the hydrocarbon impacted areas as well as from the natural forest area. The hydrocarbon genesis of the soil magnetics within oil and gas fields suggested by the presence of iron sulphides, oxidation of pyrite, transformation of the antiferromagnetic hexagonal pyrrhotite into ferromagnetic monoclinic pyrrhotite.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20215521041
2021-05-11
2024-10-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2021/gis2021/Soil_mineral_magnetism_of_the_Rubaniv_gas_field.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20215521041&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Gadirov, V., Eppelbaum, L., Kuderavets, R., Menshov, O. and Gadirov, K.
    [2018] Indicative features of localmagnetic anomalies from hydrocarbon deposits: Examples from Azerbaijan and Ukraine. Acta Geophysica. 66, 6, 1463–1483.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gonet, T. and Wojas, A.
    [2016] Investigation of the magnetic properties of soils in the Cisna-Wetlina Landscape Park. Geology, Geophysics and Environment, 42.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hanesch, M., Stanjek, H. and Petersen, N.
    [2006] Thermomagnetic measurements of soil iron minerals: the role of organic carbon. Geophysical Journal International, 165(1), 53–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Horoshkova, L., Volkov, V. and Khlobystov, I.
    [2019] Prognostic model of mineral resources development in Ukraine. Monitoring 2019. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ivanik, O., Shevchuk, V., Tustanovska, L., Yanchenko, V. and Kravchenko, D.
    [2021] Paleogeography and neotectonics of Kaniv dislocations (Ukrainian Shield, Ukraine) in the Neogene-Quaternary period. Historical Biology, 33(1), 88–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jeleńska, M., Hasso-Agopsowicz, A. and Kopcewicz, B.
    [2010] Thermally induced transformation of magnetic minerals in soil based on rock magnetic study and Mössbauer analysis. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 179(3–4), 164–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuderavets, R., Menshov, O., Maksymchuk, V. and Chobotok, I.
    [2019] Study of the dynamic of magnetic field and soil magnetism along the Malniv-Nemyriv-Uhniv transect. 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Maksymchuk, V., Kuderavets, R., Menshov, O., Bodlak, P., Chobotok, I., Nakalov, Y. and Pyrizhok, N.
    [2020] Geomagnetic studies at Rubaniv gas field in outer zone of Carpathian Foredeep, Ukraine. Geoinformatics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mathé, V. and Lévêque, F.
    [2005] Trace magnetic minerals to detect redox boundaries and drainage effects in a marshland soil in western France. European journal of soil science, 56(6), 737–751.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Menshov, O., Kuderavets, R. and Chobotok, I.
    [2018] Magnetic and mineralogy analysis of soils of hydrocarbon prospective areas in Ukraine. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Menshov, O., Kuderavets, R., Chobotok, I. and Tymoschuk, V.
    [2014] Magnetic Studies Associated with Hydrocarbon Fields in the Ukrainian Part of Carpathian Foredeep. 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rijal, M.L., Porsch, K., Appel, E. and Kappler, A.
    [2012] Magnetic signature of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils and sediments at the former oil field Hänigsen, Germany. Studia geophysica et geodaetica, 56(3), 889–908.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Senouci, M. and Allek, K.
    [2020] Application of Bayesian classifier to magnetic and gamma ray spectrometry data for targeting hydrocarbon microseepages. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 181, 104145.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Shevchenko, O. and Menshov, O.
    [2019] Wind power stations construction at the mountain ecosystem–risk assessment and monitoring techniques. 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ulfah, M., Wijatmoko, B. and Fitriani, D.
    [2017] Magnetic Susceptibility Analysis of Soil Affected by Hydrocarbon in Wonocolo Traditional Oil Field, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 62, No. 1, p. 012002). IOP Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Vul, M.Y., Denega, B. I., Krupsky, Y.Z., Nimets, M.V., Svyrydenko, V.G. and Fedyshyn, V.O.
    (eds). [1998] Atlas of Oil and Gas Fields of Ukraine in Six volumes, Vol. IV. Western Oil and Gas-Bearing Region. Vydavnytstvo Tsentr Evropy, Lviv.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20215521041
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20215521041
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error