1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Acceptance by geophysicists to discuss the reliability of the subsurface and O&G reservoir images they produce in terms of uncertainty is a major breakthrough for the industry Quantifying Uncertainty in Depth imaging is then directly linked to Quantifying Confidence in SubSurface and Reservoir models supporting multi million dollars E&P decisions. Uncertainty on seismic processing and imaging uncertainty cannot be properly quantified by geophysical processes solving inverse problems, but only by kriging algorithms specific to seismic processing, solving reservoir estimation problems. Further and deeper integration of Kriging algorithms in geophysical processing and imaging processes will certainly lead to significant optimization of the parametrization of the geophysical processes and to quantified improvement of E&P project performance

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202170011
2021-04-12
2025-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2021/quantifying-uncertainty-depth-imaging/Paper_11.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202170011&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. (1)Geostatistical Seismic Data Processing: Equivalent to Classical Seismic Processing + Uncertainties! EAGE Vienna2011A.Shtuka (SeisQuaRe), and al.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2)Plea for Consistent Uncertainty Management in Geophysical Workflows to Better Support E&P Decision-making EAGE Amsterdam2014L.D.Sandjivy (Seisquare), and al.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202170011
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202170011
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error