1887

Abstract

Summary

In the process of mineral nucleation and growth, substrate surface properties and substrate types introduce favorable areas where nucleation events are more likely to occur. The preferential sites for mineral nucleation exist because of the lower interfacial free energy between the precipitating phase and the substrate. In this work, we used a pore-scale Lattice Boltzmann (LB)-based reactive transport model incorporated with the developed probabilistic nucleation model in our previous works to investigate the role of the interfacial free energy between the nucleating phase and the substrate on the nucleation and growth of secondary minerals. We also used Shannon entropy to assess the spatial randomness and the evolution path of the systems as solid phases form. The results showed that the developed model can accurately capture the selective behavior of nucleation processes in the presence of preferential sites. The simulation results demonstrate the importance of using a probabilistic nucleation model to capture the correct physics of this phenomenon. It is also concluded that the probabilistic nucleation models are more relevant in environments with longer induction times.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210445
2022-06-06
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fazeli, H., Masoudi, M., Patel, R. A., Aagaard, P., and Hellevang, H. [2020]. Pore-Scale Modeling of Nucleation and Growth in Porous Media.ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 4(2), 249–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hellevang, H., Wolff-Boenisch, D., and Nooraiepour, M. [2019]. Kinetic control on the distribution of secondary precipitates during CO2-basalt interactions.E3S Web of Conferences, 98.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Manzari Tavakoli, H., Jamialahmadi, M., Kord, S., and Daryasafar, A. [2018]. Experimental investigation of the effect of silica nanoparticles on the kinetics of barium sulfate scaling during water injection process.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 169, 344–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Masoudi, M. [2021]. Near Wellbore Processes during Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS): An Integrated Modeling Approach.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Masoudi, M., Fazeli, H., Miri, R., and Hellevang, H. [2021]. Pore scale modeling and evaluation of clogging behavior of salt crystal aggregates in CO2-rich phase during carbon storage.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 111, 103475.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Miri, R., and Hellevang, H. [2016]. Salt precipitation during CO2 storage—A review.INT J GREENH GAS CON, 51, 136–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nooraiepour, M., Masoudi, M., and Hellevang, H. [2021]. Probabilistic nucleation governs time, amount, and location of mineral precipitation and geometry evolution in the porous medium.Scientific Reports11, 16397.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nooraiepour, M., Masoudi, M., Shokri, N., and Hellevang, H. [2021]. Probabilistic Nucleation and Crystal Growth in Porous Medium: New Insights from Calcium Carbonate Precipitation on Primary and Secondary Substrates.ACS Omega, 6(42), 28072–28083.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pandey, S. N., Vishal, V., and Chaudhuri, A. [2018]. Geothermal reservoir modeling in a coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical approach: A review.Earth-Science Reviews, 185, 1157–1169.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Parvin, S., Masoudi, M., Sundal, A., and Miri, R. [2020]. Continuum scale modelling of salt precipitation in the context of CO2 storage in saline aquifers with MRST compositional.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 99, 103075.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Patel, R. A., Churakov, S. V, and Prasianakis, N. I. [2021]. A multi-level pore scale reactive transport model for the investigation of combined leaching and carbonation of cement paste.Cement and Concrete Composites, 115, 103831.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Pham, V. T. H., Lu, P., Aagaard, P., Zhu, C., and Hellevang, H. [2011]. On the potential of CO2–water–rock interactions for CO2 storage using a modified kinetic model.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5(4), 1002–1015.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210445
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210445
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error