Multicomponent De-Ghosting Using a Hybrid Operator in Frequency and Space

References

1. Amundsen, L. [1993] Wavenumber-based filtering of marine point-source dataGeophysics58 (9), 133–1348
   [Google Scholar]
2. Caprioli, P. B. A., Özdemir, A. K., Özbek, A., Kragh, J. E., van Manen, D. J., Christie, P. A. F. and Robertsson, J. O. A. [2012] Combination of Multi-component Streamer Pressure and Vertical Particle Velocity - Theory and Application to Data, 74th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition cp-293–337
   [Google Scholar]
3. Day, A., Kluver, T., Sollner, Tabti H. and Carlson, D. [2013] Wavefield-separation methods for dual-sensor towed-streamer dataGeophysics78 (2) WA55–WA70
   [Google Scholar]
4. Grion, S., TellingR. and Holland, S. [2016] Phase-shift de-ghosting, 78th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We SRS3 09
   [Google Scholar]
5. Grion, S. [2017] Guided phase-shift de-ghosting, 79th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, We A1 03
   [Google Scholar]
6. Poole, G. and Cooper, J. [2018] Multi-Sensor Receiver Deghosting Using Data Domain Sparseness Weights, 80th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, We A10 08
   [Google Scholar]
7. Tang, Z. and CampmanX. [2017] Joint up/down decomposition and reconstruction using three-component streamers with or without ghost model: the sampling theory. Geophysical Prospecting65956–980
   [Google Scholar]
8. Vassallo, M., Özbek, A., Özdemir, K. and Eggenberger, K. [2010] Crossline wavefield reconstruction from multicomponent streamer data: Part 1 — Multichannel interpolation by matching pursuit (MIMAP) using pressure and its crossline gradient. Geophysics75 (6) WB53–WB67
   [Google Scholar]