1887

Abstract

Summary

High-dimensional wavefield solutions, like Green’s functions, are important to waveform inversion and imaging applications. Their numerical representations often require large memory or disk space allocation, and thus, are computationally intensive to access. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have shown considerable potential, as neural solvers, to add flexibility and scalability to the solution. However, when dealing with high-dimensional wavefields, their accuracy and the training cost limit their applicabilities. Thus, based on the single reference frequency loss function, we propose a PINN implementation for wavefield solutions that utilizes frequency extension and neuron splitting. As a result, the neural network model can grow in size to accommodate the increase in frequency range while leveraging the pre-trained model for the narrow frequency-range wavefield, resulting in fast convergence and high-accuracy solutions. Numerical results show that, compared to the commonly used PINN with the random initialization, the proposed PINN exhibits notable superiority in terms of convergence and accuracy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210542
2022-06-06
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alkhalifah, T., Song, C., bin Waheed, U. and Hao, Q. [2021] wavefields solutions from machine learned functions constrained by the Helmholtz equation. Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences, 2, 11–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Huang, X. and Alkhalifah, T. [2021a] PINNup: Robust neural network wavefield solutions using frequency upscaling and neuron splitting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.14536.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Huang, X. and Alkhalifah, T. [2021b] Single Reference Frequency Loss for Multi-frequency wavefields Representation using Physics-Informed Neural Networks. In: NeurIPS 2021 AI for Science Workshop.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, X., Alkhalifah, T. and Song, C. [2021] A modified physics-informed neural network with positional encoding. In: First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy. SEG, 2480–2484.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, Q., Wu, L. and Wang, D. [2019] Splitting Steepest Descent for Growing Neural Architectures. In: 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Marfurt, K.J. [1984] Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave equations. GEOPHYSICS, 49(5), 533–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rahaman, N., Baratin, A., Arpit, D., Draxler, F., Lin, M., Hamprecht, F., Bengio, Y. and Courville, A. [2019] On the spectral bias of neural networks. In: ICML. PMLR, 5301–5310.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G. [2019] Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Song, C., Alkhalifah, T. and Waheed, U.B. [2022] A versatile framework to solve the Helmholtz equation using physics-informed neural networks. Geophysical Journal International, 228(3), 1750–1762.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, S., Teng, Y. and Perdikaris, P. [2021] Understanding and Mitigating Gradient Flow Pathologies in Physics-Informed Neural Networks. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 43(5), A3055–A3081.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Luo, T. and Xu, Z.Q. [2021] Embedding Principle of Loss Landscape of Deep Neural Networks. In: 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210542
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210542
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error