Effects of Source Mispositioning on Repeatability for Onshore Das VSP Data

References

1. Al Jabri, Y. [2011] Land seismic repeatability prediction from near-surface investigations at Naylor Field, Otway. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Department of Exploration Geophysics. Curtin University.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bakulin, A., Smith, R., Jervis, M. and Burnstad, R. [2014] Near surface changes and 4D seismic repeatability in desert environment: From days to years. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014, 4843–4847.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakulin, A., Smith, R., Jervis, M., Saragiotis, C., Al-Hemyari, E. and Alramadhan, A. [2016] Processing and repeatability of 4D buried receiver data in a desert environment. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016, 5405–5409.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Correa, J. C., Dean, T., Van Zaanen, L., Tertyshnikov, K. V., Pevzner, R. and Bona, A. [2017] A Comparison of DAS and Geophones for VSP Acquisition At a Dedicated Field Laboratory. 2017(1), 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Johnston, D. H. [2013] Practical Applications of Time-lapse Seismic Data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kragh, E. and Christie, P. [2002] Seismic repeatability, normalized rms, and predictability. The Leading Edge21(7), 640–647.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Landro, M. [1999] Repeatability issues of 3-D VSP data. Geophysics64(6), 1673–1679.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Lumley, D. E. [2001] Time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring. Geophysics66(1), 50–53.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Pevzner, R., Shulakova, V., Kepic, A. and Urosevic, M. [2011] Repeatability analysis of land time-lapse seismic data: CO2CRC Otway pilot project case study. Geophysical Prospecting59(1), 66–77.
   [Google Scholar]