1887

Abstract

Summary

Many industrial activities needed to sustain human society have the potential to induce earthquakes. With the increasing availability of data and computational resources, researchers have started to exploit the capabilities of machine learning algorithms to detect, locate, and interpret seismic events. For hypocenter localization, typically a convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained in a supervised manner using a historical or synthetically generated dataset. However, this approach often requires a huge amount of labeled data that may not be readily available. Therefore, we propose a hypocenter location method based on the emerging paradigm of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). Using observed P-wave arrival times for an event, we train a neural network by minimizing a loss function given by the misfit of observed and predicted traveltimes, and the residual of the eikonal equation. The hypocenter location is then obtained by finding the location of the minimum traveltime in the computational domain. Through synthetic tests, we show the efficacy of the proposed method in obtaining robust hypocenter locations, even in the presence of sparse traveltime observations. This is due to the use of the eikonal residual term in the loss function that acts as a physics-informed regularizer.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210773
2022-06-06
2024-06-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bancroft, J.C., Wong, J. and Han, L. [2010] Sensitivity of locating of a microseismic event when using analytic solutions and the frst arrival times. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2010, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2191–2195.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Foulger, G.R., Wilson, M.P., Gluyas, J.G., Julian, B.R. and Davies, R.J. [2018] Global review of human-induced earthquakes. Earth-Science Reviews, 178, 438–514.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Grubas, S., Yaskevich, S. and Duchkov, A. [2021] Localization of microseismic events using the physics-informed neural-network for traveltime computation. In: 82nd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, 2021. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lienert, B.R., Berg, E. and Frazer, L.N. [1986] HYPOCENTER: An earthquake location method using centered, scaled, and adaptively damped least squares. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 76(3), 771–783.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Perol, T., Gharbi, M. and Denolle, M. [2018] Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location. Science Advances, 4(2), e1700578.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pugh, D.J., White, R.S. and Christie, P.A.F. [2016] A Bayesian method for microseismic source inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 206(2), 1009–1038.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G.E. [2019] Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sethian, J.A. [1996] A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(4), 1591–1595.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith, J.D., Ross, Z.E., Azizzadenesheli, K. and Muir, J.B. [2022] HypoSVI: Hypocentre inversion with Stein variational inference and physics informed neural networks. Geophysical Journal International, 228(1), 698–710.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Stein, M. [1987] Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics, 29, 143–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Waheed, U., Alkhalifah, T., Haghighat, E., Song, C. and Virieux, J. [2021] PINNtomo: Seismic tomography using physics-informed neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04536.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Waldhauser, F. and Ellsworth, W.L. [2000] A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 90(6), 1353–1368.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, H., Alkhalifah, T., bin Waheed, U. and Birnie, C. [2021] Data-driven Microseismic Event Localization: an Application to the Oklahoma Arkoma Basin Hydraulic Fracturing Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, P., Han, L., Gao, H. and Sun, H. [2015] Genetic algorithm full waveform inversion for microseismic location. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2650–2654.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210773
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202210773
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error