1887

Abstract

Summary

We present a new target-enclosing full-waveform inversion method based on a new objective function. This objective function is based on the mismatch between wavefields reconstructed in the target domain with the convolution and correlation representation formulas, using data from the boundary of the target domain. The proposed method requires only kinematic knowledge of the subsurface model, particularly the overburden for redatuming, and no reconstruction of the model outside of the target area. In this sense it is truly local. We show a synthetic example with exactly redatumed wavefields and compare it with conventional FWI of surface data. The potential of the proposed method is demonstrated both in terms of the quality of target recovery and reduction in computational cost.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202229019
2022-02-07
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CuiT., RickettJ., VasconcelosI. and VeitchB.
    [2020] Target-oriented full-waveform inversion using Marchenko redatumed wavefields. Geophysical Journal International, 223, 792–810.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. da CostaC.A.N., JesseC. Costa, J.C. Medeiros, W.E., Verschuur, D.J. and SoniA.K.
    [2018] Target-level waveform inversion: a prospective application of the convolution-type representation for the acoustic wavefield, Geophysical Prospecting, 67, 69–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GuoQ. and AlkhalifahT.
    [2020] Target-oriented waveform redatuming and high-resolution inversion: Role of the overburden, Geophysics, 85, R525–R536.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jaimes-OsorioL.E., MalcolmA., ZheglovaP., KoeneE.F.M. and ThomsenH.R
    [2021] Reduced memory implementation of a local elastic finite-difference solver. Geophysics, 86, A25–A33.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. VasconcelosI., RavasiM. and van der NeutJ.
    [2016] Subsurface-domain, interferometric objective functions for target-oriented waveform inversion. Geophysics, 82, A37–A41.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WapenaarK.
    [2007] General representations for wavefield modelling and inversion in geophysics. Geophysics, 72, SM5–SM17.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. WapenaarK., ThorbeckeJ., van der NeutJ., BrogginiF., SlobE., and SniederR.
    [2014] Marchenko imaging, Geophysics, 79, WA39–WA57.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. WillemsenB., MalcolmA. and LewisW.
    [2016] A numerically exact local solver applied to salt boundary inversion in seismic full-waveform inversion: Geophysical Journal International, 204, 1703–1720.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ZheglovaP. and MalcolmA.
    [2020] Vector-acoustic full-waveform inversion: Taking advantage of wavefield separation and dealiasing. Geophysics, 85, R409–R423.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202229019
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202229019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error