1887

Abstract

Summary

Geothermal prospectivity mapping using multiple-criteria decision analysis is well-documented in the scientific literature. However, most previous works suffer from two drawbacks: no consideration of the geology for defining the weights of the decision criteria, and no metrics of reliability for the prospectivity prediction. In this work, we introduce a method that overcomes these drawbacks and extends on a large scale the mapping provided manually by the experts. The method is based on (i) automatic regressions of both heat flow and thermal gradient maps using a multi-model approach, (ii) introduction of geology-dependent criteria weights for the decision analysis, and (iii) combination of multiple decision maps to obtain a more robust prospectivity mapping and a quantification of the reliability of the prediction. Applied to geothermal data from British Columbia, the method appears to produce prospectivity maps with higher spatial resolution than conventional ones. Besides, it substantially attenuates the footprint of data acquisition and facilitates the identification of geographical zones where the prediction is the most uncertain, thus where a human subjective interpretation would have the most added value. The proposed workflow is easily transposable to any context of subsurface exploration or exploitation, for instance in the petroleum, mining, or hydrogeological industries.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202239014
2022-03-23
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fairbank. B.D., Faulkner. R.L., and Hickson. C.J.
    (1992). Geothermal resources of British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Grasby. S.E., Jessop. A., Kelman. M., Ko. M., Chen. Z., Allen. D.M., Bell. S., Ferguson. G., Majorowicz. J., Moore. M., and Raymond. J.
    (2012). Geothermal energy resource potential of Canada. Open File 6914. https://doi.org/10.4095/291488
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kimball, S.
    (2010). Favourability map of British Columbia geothermal resources. MS thesis dissertation. University of British Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LeDell, E., and Poirier, S.
    (2020). H2O AutoML: Scalable Automatic Machine Learning. 7th ICML Workshop on Automated Machine Learning (AutoML). July 2020. URL https://www.automl.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AutoML_2020_paper_61.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Moghaddam, M.K., Samadzadegan, F., Noorollahi, Y., Sharifi, M.A., and Itoi, R.
    (2014). Spatial analysis and multi-criteria decision making for regional-scale geothermal favorability map. Geothermics50. 189–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Saaty. R.W.
    (1987) The Analytic Hierarchy Process—What It Is and How It Is Used. Mathematical Modelling9(3). 161–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Triantaphyllou, E.
    (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202239014
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202239014
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error