Neural Solution to Elliptic PDE with Discontinuous Coefficients for Flow in Porous Media

References

1. [1]Durlofsky, L.J., A triangle based mixed finite element finite volume technique for modeling two phase flow through porous media. J.Comput.Phys(1993),252–266.
   [Google Scholar]
2. [2]Edwards, M.G., Superconvergent Renormalization and Tensor Approximation,Conference Proceedings, ECMOR V - 5th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Sep 1996, cp-101-00041, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214‑4609.201406902
   https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201406902 [Google Scholar]
3. [3]Edwards, M.G., Unstructured, control-volume distributed, full-tensor finite volume schemes with flow based grids. Comput.Geo. (2002), no.6, 433–452.
   [Google Scholar]
4. [4]Eigestad, G.T. and Klausen, R.A., On convergence of multi-point flux approximation omethod; numerical experiment for discontinuous permeability. (2nd edn). Submitted to Numer.Meth.Part.Diff.Eqs.
   [Google Scholar]
5. [5]Guo, X., Li, W., and Iorio, F., Convulutional Neural Networks for Steady Flow Approximation, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939738.
   https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939738 [Google Scholar]
6. [6]Hagan, M.T., H.B.Demuth, and M.H.Beale, Neural Network Design, Boston, MA: PWS Publishing, 1996.
   [Google Scholar]
7. [7]Aavatsmark, I.Introduction to multipoint flux approximation for quadrilateral grids. Comput.Geo(2002),no.6,405–432.
   [Google Scholar]
8. [8]KirillZubov, et al.NeuralPDE: Automating Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) with Error Approximations., 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.09443.
   [Google Scholar]
9. [9]Lie, K. (2019). An Introduction to Reservoir Simulation Using MATLAB/GNU Octave: User Guide for the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108591416
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108591416 [Google Scholar]
10. [10]MATLAB. version 9.10.0 (R2021a). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.; 2010.
11. [11]Pal, M. and Edwards, M.G., Effective upscaling using a family of flux-continuous, finite-volume schemes for the pressure equation. In Proceedings, ACME 06 Conference, Queens University Belfast,Northern Ireland-UK, pages 127–130, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
12. [12]PalM., EdwardsM.G., andLamb A.R., Convergence study of a family of flux-continuous, Finite-volume schemes for the general tensor pressure equation. Numerical Methods in Fluids, Volume 51, Issue: 9–10, Pages 1177–1203, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
13. [13]PalM.Families of control-volume distributed cvd(mpfa) finite volume schemes for the porous medium pressure equation on structured and unstructured grids. PhD Thesis, University of Wales, Swansea-UK, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
14. [14]Pal, M., and Edwards, M. G., The competing effects of discretization and upscaling - A study using the q-family of CVD-MPFA. ECMOR 2008 - 11th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
15. [15]Pal, M., The effects of control-volume distributed multi-point flux approximation (CVD-MPFA) on upscaling-A study using the CVD-MPFA schemes, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Volume 68, Issue 1, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
16. [16]Pal, M., and Edwards, M. G., q-Families of CVD(MPFA) Schemes on General Elements: Numerical Convergence and the Maximum PrincipleArch Computat Methods Eng17, 137–189 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-010-9043-4
    [Google Scholar]
17. [17]Pal, M., and Edwards, M.G., Non-linear flux-splitting schemes with imposed discrete maximum principle for elliptic equations with highly anisotropic coefficients,Intl. Journal for Numerical Method in Fluids, Vo. 66, Issue 3, p299–323, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
18. [18]Pal, M., A unified approach to simulation and upscaling of single-phase flow through vuggy carbonates. Intl. Journal for Numerical Method in Fluids, 10.1002/fd.2630,2012.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/fd.2630,2012 [Google Scholar]
19. [19]PalM. and EdwardsM.G., The effects of control-volume distributed multi-point flux approximation (CVD-MPFA) on upscaling-A study using the CVD-MPFA schemes. Int.J.Numer.Methods in Fluids, 10.1002/fld.2492, 2012.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2492 [Google Scholar]
20. [20]Pal, M., Lamine, S., Lie, K.-A., and Krogstad, S., Validation of multiscale mixed finite-element method,International Journal of Numerical Methods in Fluids, Volume 77, Issure 4, Pages 2006–223, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
21. [21]Pal, M.On application of machine learning method for history matching and forecasting of times series data from hydrocarbon recovery process using water fooding, Petroleum Science and Technology, Volume 39, 2021 - Issue 15–16.
    [Google Scholar]
22. [22]Pal, M., Makauska, P., Saxena, P., and Patil, P., The Neural Upscaling Method for Single-Phase flow in Porous Medium, Paper Presented at EAGE-ECMOR 2022 Conference, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
23. [23]Perlin, Ken (July 1985). An Image Synthesizer. SIGGRAPH Comput.Graph.19(97 -8930):287–296.doi:10.1145/325165.32524
    https://doi.org/10.1145/325165.32524 [Google Scholar]
24. [24]Ricky T. Q.Chen, YuliaRubanova, JesseBettencourt, DavidDuvenaud., Neural Ordinary Differential Equations. 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2018), Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
25. [25]Vasilyeva, M., and Tyrylgin, A., Machine learning for accelerating effective property prediction for poroelasticity problem in stochastic media., 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01586.
    [Google Scholar]
26. [26]Wu, J.-L., Xioa, H., and Paterson, E. G., Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework., Physical Review Fluids Vol.2, 073602, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
27. [27]Russel, T.F. and Wheeler, M.F.Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods for Continuous Flows in Porous Media. Chapter 2, in the Mathematics of Reservoir Simulation, R.E.Ewing ed, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics SIAM 1983, pp 35–106
    [Google Scholar]