1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Over the past twenty years, 3D seismic ray tracing has evolved from a research tool to a more operational tool because of increasing interest in the petroleum industry. During the last few decades, inversion (tomographic) modeling has largely replaced the bulky forward algorithm as a faster and more efficient tool for determining the distribution of seismic velocities, due to several disadvantages of the forward method. The process of manual model fitting, performed for multiple blast points simultaneously, is difficult and time-consuming, especially compared to inverse automatic methods.

The modern modification of the inverse ray tracing problem solution is seismic reflection tomography. It deals with the analysis of curved rays that are reflected and refracted inside the Earth. In reflection tomography, space is divided into cells, each having a certain velocity and reflectivity. The final model is the one whose velocities and reflectivities best describe the data.

The history of the formation of seismic ray tomography as a method of studying the Earth’s interior begins with the study of earthquakes as sources of seismic waves that are registered by seismometers. This technique turned out to be quite effective because it allowed distinguishing the mantle and the core. After this research seismic tomography became a method of geophysical research. The further development of seismic tomography contributed to interest in its use as a tool for obtaining additional information on the structure of deposits. Further development of tomography was timed to solve the problem of lack of ambiguity between reflection depth and reflected waves velocity ( turned-ray tomography, SMART method, using B-spline representation and etc.).

Analysed algorithms bring about a conclusion that the 3D reflection tomography described in this paper has proven to be efficient for a geologic synthetic structure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580258
2022-11-15
2024-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2022/monitoring'2022/Mon-22-258.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580258&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Dziewonski, A. & Anderson, D. (1984). Seismic Tomography of the Earth’s Interior.American Scientist, 72.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. EhingerA. and LaillyP. (1995), “Velocity model determination by the SMART method, part 1: Theory,” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 739–742. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1887376
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GuiziouJ. L., MalletJ. L., and MadariagaR. (1996), “3-D seismic reflection tomography on top of the GOCAD depth modeler,” Geophysics61: 1499–1510. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444075
    [Google Scholar]
  4. JuradoF., SinoquetD., EhingerA.. (1996) 3D reflection tomography designed for complex structures.SEG Annual meeting, Nov 1996, Denvers, United States.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lailly, P. and Sinoquet, D. (1996) Smooth velocity models in reflection tomography for imaging complex geological structures, Geophysical Journal, vol. 124, issue 2, pp. 349–362
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MaoW.and Stuart G. W. (1997) Transmission-reflection tomography: Application to reverse VSP data.Geophysics, 62 (3), 884–894.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Stefani, J. P. (1995) Turning-ray tomography: Geophysics60:1917–1929.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. TroinichK., VyzhvaS.Efficiency algorithm of seismic ray tomography in processing extensive seismic data [in Ukrainian].
    [Google Scholar]
  9. TroynichK., VyzhvaS. (2014) Effective algorithm of seismic ray tomography when processing large arrays of seismic data.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ZhuX., SixtaD. P., and AngstmanB. G. (1992), “Tomostatics: Turning‐ray tomography + static corrections,” The Leading Edge11: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1436864
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580258
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580258
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error