1887

Abstract

Summary

Fluid indicators derived from rock-physics play an important role in hydrocarbon detection of conventional oil and gas reservoirs ( ), and also provide guidance for hydrate reservoir identification. The effective pore-fluid bulk modulus proves to be a more favorable fluid indicator as it eliminates the influence of porosity ( ). However, the use of the critical porosity model in the derivation of the effective pore-fluid bulk modulus reflection coefficient limits its application to hydrate reservoirs. Therefore, we have re-expressed the reflection coefficient equation for the effective fluid bulk modulus using the consolidation parameter and defined it as the fluid indicator of the hydrate reservoir. The model analysis shows that the accuracy of the novel fluid indicator meets the needs of the pre-stack seismic inversion, while the consolidation parameter can evaluate the consolidation and compaction of the rocks and is more meaningful for shallow subsea reservoirs. Stable prediction of model parameters is achieved using a boundary constraint inversion method proposed under the Bayesian framework. The field data application further demonstrates that the proposed method is accurate and effective in hydrate reservoir identification.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310145
2023-06-05
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. LiuQ, YinX Y, LiC. [2015] Fluid discrimination based on rock physics templates. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering. 12(5): 830–838.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. LiK, YinX Y, ZongZ Y, et al. [2022] Estimation of porosity, fluid bulk modulus, and stiff-pore volume fraction using a multitrace Bayesian amplitude-variation-with-offset petrophysics inversion in multiporosity reservoirs. Geophysics. 87(1): M25–M41.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. RussellB H, HedlinK, HiltermanF J. [2003] Fluid-property discrimination with AVO: a Biot-Gassmann perspective. Geophysics. 68(1): 29–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. RussellB H, GrayD, HampsonD P. [2011] Linearized AVO and poroelasticity. Geophysics. 76(3): C19–C29.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. YinX Y, ZhangS X. [2014] Bayesian inversion for effective pore-fluid bulk modulus based on fluid-matrix decoupled amplitude variation with offset approximation. Geophysics. 79(5): R221–R232.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. YangW Q, YangZ F, ZongZ Y, et al. [2022] AVA inversion for novel fluid indicator considering consolidation parameter. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering. 19(6): 1280–1299.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310145
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310145
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error