1887

Abstract

Summary

The stationary-phase method applied to migration with a time-shift extension in a 2-D constant-velocity model with a dipped reflector produces two solutions in the domain of the extended image: one a straight line and the other a curve. If the velocity differs from the true one, the depth error follows from the depth and apparent dip of the reflector as well as the depth of the amplitude peak at a non-zero time shift, where the two solutions meet and the extended image focuses. The results are compared to finite-frequency results from a finite-difference code. A 2-D synthetic example with a salt diapir illustrates how depth errors can be estimated in an inhomogeneous model after inverting the seismic data for the velocity model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310690
2023-06-05
2026-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Duveneck, E. [2021] Angle gathers from time-shift extended least-squares reverse-time migration. In: Conference Proceedings, 82nd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Faye, J.P. and Jeannot, J.P. [1986] Prestack migration velocities from focusing depth analysis. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1986. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 438–440.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Higginbotham, J.H., Brown, M.P. and Clapp, R.G. [2008] Wave equation migration velocity focusing analysis. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2008. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 3083–3087.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MacKay, S. and Abma, R. [1992] Imaging and velocity estimation with depth-focusing analysis. Geophysics, 57(12), 1608–1622.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mulder, W.A. [2001] Higher-order mass-lumped finite elements for the wave equation. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 9(2), 671–680.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mulder, W.A. [2008] Automatic velocity analysis with the two-way wave equation. In: Conference Proceedings, 70th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2008. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mulder, W.A. [2014] Subsurface offset behaviour in velocity analysis with extended reflectivity images. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(1), 17–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mulder, W.A. and van Leeuwen, T. [2008] Automatic migration velocity analysis and multiples. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2008. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 3128–3132.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Østmo, S., Mulder, W.A. and Plessix, R. [2002] Finite-difference iterative migration by linearized waveform inversion in the frequency domain. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2002. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1384–1387.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sava, P. and Fomel, S. [2006] Time-shift imaging condition in seismic migration. Geophysics, 71(6), S209–S217.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Weibull, W.W. and Arntsen, B. [2013] Automatic velocity analysis with reverse-time migration. Geophysics, 78(4), S179–S192.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310690
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310690
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error