1887

Abstract

Summary

Aiming to unlock the full potential of Abu Dhabi’s exploration and development targets, late 2018 saw the launch of the world’s largest Ocean bottom sensor (OBS) campaign to date, deployed across a surface area of 26,000 square kilometres. In all, over 2 million ocean bottom nodes and sensors were deployed, resulting in approximately 700 billion recorded seismic traces.

The data were acquired in an ultra-shallow water environment, with water depths between 3 – 50m. The regional geology is characterised by: a hard and rugose water bottom; a complex near surface; and a basin scale layer-cake geology with local variations created by channels and karsts, overlaying deeper salt related structures. The complex near surface is defined by a laminated sequence of carbonates, anhydrite and shale layers, exhibiting very high levels of apparent transverse anisotropy and strong velocity inversions.

In the following paper, we will discuss these two topics, FWI and demultiple, in detail and demonstrate that they are the key enablers in delivering a high quality, regional subsurface image from the world’s largest OBS survey.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310700
2023-06-05
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Almheiri, A., Paul, S., Hasan, S., Barajas, C., Safaei, B., Mahgoub, M. and Cambois, G. [2022] An unprecedented uplift in seismic imaging from an ultra-shallow water field, offshoreAbu Dhabi. 2022 ADIPEC Exhibition and Conference, Expanded Abstracts, SPE-211669-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Amundsen, L. [2001] Elimination of free-surface related multiples without the need of the source wavelet. Geophysics, 66(1), 327–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cambois, G., Almesaabi, S., Casson, G. A., Cowell, J., Mahgoub, M. and Alkobaisi, A. [2019] The world’s largest continuous 3D onshore and offshore seismic survey sets ambitious quality and turnaround targets. 89th International Annual Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 12–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Haacke, R., Gregory, I., Dobo, Z., Henderson, J. R. and McDonnell, P. [2019] Getting the best out of up/down deconvolution for 3D and 4D imaging. 2nd Workshop Practical Reservoir Monitoring, EAGE, Abstract, 1–3.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hermant, O., Khakimov, O., Hutahayan, B., Barajas, C., Cambois, G., Mahgoub, M. [2022] FWI using reflections in shallow waters offshoreAbu Dhabi. 2022 ADIPEC Exhibition and Conference, Expanded Abstracts, SPE-211703-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Liner, C. L. [2014] Long-wave elastic attenuation produced by horizontal layering. The Leading Edge, 33(6), 634–638.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Métivier, L., Brossier, R., Mérigot, Q., Oudet, E. and Virieux, J. [2016] Measuring the misfit between seismograms using an optimal transport distance: Application to full waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 205(1), 345–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Virieux, J. and Operto, S. [2009] An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), 127–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, Y., Bale, R., Grion, R., Holden, J. [2010] The ups and downs of ocean-bottom seismic processing: applications of wavefield separation and up-down deconvolution. The Leading Edge, 29(10), 936–943.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, Z., Wu, Z., Wei, J. M., Huang, R. and Wang, P. [2020] FWI Imaging: Full-wavefield imaging through full-waveform inversion. 90th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 656–660.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310700
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310700
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error