Realistic synthetic seismograms from digital siblings: Building sharp pseudo-velocities from inverted legacy data

References

1. Alkhalifah, T., Wang, H. and Ovcharenko, O., (2021), MLReal: Bridging the gap between training on synthetic data and real data applications in machine learning: Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences, Volume 3, 2022, 101–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiig.2022.09.002
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chan, S. H., Khoshabeh, R., Gibson, K. B., Gill, P. E., Nguyen, T.Q., 2011, An augmented lagrangian Method for total variation video restoration: IEEE Transactions on imageProcessing, 20, no.11, 3097–3111
   [Google Scholar]
3. Gao, H., Wu, X., and Liu, G., (2021), “ChannelSeg3D: Channel simulation and deep learning for channel interpretation in 3D seismic images,” GEOPHYSICS86: IM73–IM83. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0572.1
   [Google Scholar]
4. Huff, O., Thorkildsen, V., Greiner, T.L., Lie, J.E., Bugge, A.J., Evensen, K.E., (2023), Convolutional Neural Network-based Restoration of Near Offsets in Marine Seismic Data, submitted to EAGE Annual 2023
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kolbjørnsen, O. and Evensen, A.K., (2019), Digital superresolution in seismic amplitude processing, SEG technical program expanded abstracts. 2019, 579–584,
   [Google Scholar]
6. Qu, S., Verschuur, E., Zhang, D., and Chen, Y. [2021] Training Deep Networks with Only Synthetic Data: Deep-learning-based Near-offset Reconstruction for (Closed-loop) Surface-related Multiple Estimation on Shallow-water Field Data. Geophysics, 86, A39–A43, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0723.1.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Versteeg, R., and Lailly, P., 1991, Eaeg workshop report: Practical aspects of seismic data inversion: First Break, 9, no. 2, 75–80
   [Google Scholar]
8. Waldeland, Anders U. et al. (2018). ‘Convolutional neural networks for automated seismic interpretation’. In: The Leading Edge37. 7, pp. 529–537. doi: 10.1190/tle37070529.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/tle37070529.1 [Google Scholar]