1887

Abstract

Summary

In this contribution we evaluate the theoretical storage capacities of CO2, H2 and NH3 of the Frigg Field (North Sea, Norway) as an example for re-use of shut down O&G fields. Large quantities of these fluids can be theoretically stored in the depleted field. However, historical hydrocarbon regions are extensively drilled by exploration and production wells and their remanences will be in contact with reservoir brines of dynamic geochemical properties. Thus, cement degradation and steel corrosion of these old legacy wells are expected with risks for the stored fluids to leak outside the anticipated storage unit. To detect and monitor wells numerical simulations are necessary. We explore the potential of non-invasive monitoring for qualifying legacy well integrity. Relative differences in plug/no-plug scenarios show promise for plug detection in legacy wells. Additionally, we evaluate the geophysical observable changes due to fluid injection with respect to hydrogen and ammonia saturation. Preliminary results indicate that H2 monitoring with seismic methods might be challenging and CSEM monitoring is probably the better method. Seismic observables are however very sensitive to ammonia saturation changes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310753
2023-06-05
2026-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. De Leebeeck, A. [1987]. The Frigg field reservoir: characteristics and performance. North Sea Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 89–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Emmel, B., Dupuy, B. [2021]. Dataset of plugging and abandonment status from exploration wells drilled within the Troll gas and oil field in the Norwegian North Sea. Data in brief,
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hemme, C., Berk, W. [2018]. Hydrogeochemical Modeling to Identify Potential Risks of Underground Hydrogen Storage in Depleted Gas Fields. Applied Sciences8. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112282
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Holloway, S. (Ed.), [1996]. The Underground Disposal of Carbon Dioxide, Final Report of Joule II project No. CT92-0031, pp. 116–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Londe, L. [2021]. Four ways to store large quantities of hydrogen. 10.2118/208178‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/208178-MS [Google Scholar]
  6. Robertson, I.M., Sofronis, P., Nagao, A. et al. [2015] Hydrogen Embrittlement Understood. Metall Mater TransA 46, 2323–2341. doi.org/10.1007/s11661‑015‑2836‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-2836-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Romdhane, A., Emmel, B., Zonetti, S., Dupuy, B. [2020]. Screening and Non-Invasive Geophysical Monitoring of Legacy Wells Integrity for Offshore CO2 Storage. Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference (GHGT-16). dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4276670
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4276670 [Google Scholar]
  8. RomdhaneA, EmmelB, ZonettiS, DupuyB, GawelK, EdvardsenL and BhuiyanMH [2022]. Screening, Monitoring, and Remediation of Legacy Wells to Improve Reservoir Integrity for Large-Scale CO2 Storage—An Example From the Smeaheia Structure in the Northern North Sea. Front. Energy Res.10:826100. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.826100
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.826100 [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310753
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310753
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error