1887

Abstract

Summary

Accurate lithofacies classification and petrophysical property modeling represent essential steps to preserve the reservoir heterogeneity and capture the uncertainty space for reservoir modeling and field development optimization. It is crucial to model the discrete lithofacies distribution as a function of well logging attributes for the prediction at the unsampled intervals. In this research, the Decision tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF) were sequentially adopted for lithofacies classification and permeability regression applied to data from the Yamama reservoir in a middle-eastern gas field.

The measured discrete lithofacies distribution was comparatively modeled as a function of well-log data: water saturation, shale volume, total porosity, and effective porosity. The classification accuracy was 92% for both DT and RF. Therefore; the RF-predicted lithofacies were then combined with the well-log data to model the permeability. For accurate modeling and to avoid overfitting, cross-validation of random sub-sampling was performed on the data set to split it into two sub-sets; 70% training subset for modeling and 30% testing subset for prediction. The adjusted R-squared was 0.971 and 0.915 for the RF and DT regression models, respectively. The resulting model can be later used to predict the facies and permeability at other wells of completely unavailable core measurements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310762
2023-06-05
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Mudhafar, W. J. M.Integrating machine learning and data analytics for geostatistical characterization of clastic reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Volume 195, 107837 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107837
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ameur-Zaimeche, O., Zeddouri, A., Heddam, S., and Kechiched, R.Lithofacies prediction in non-cored wells from the Sif Fatima oil field (Berkine basin, southern Algeria): A comparative study of multilayer perceptron neural network and cluster analysis-based approaches. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 166 (2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jassim, S. Z., Buday, T., and Goff, J. C.Late Tithonian-Early Turonian Megasequence AP8. Geology of Iraq: Dolin, Brno, Praque and Moravian Museum, 124–140 (2006).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, Y. and Anderson-Sprecher, R.Facies identification from well logs: A comparison of discriminant analysis and naïve Bayes classifier. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Volume 53, Issues 3–4: 149–157 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.06.001
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nwachukwu, C.Machine Learning Solutions for Reservoir Characterization, Management, and Optimization. The University of Texas at Austin (2006).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Powers, R. W., Ramirez, L. E., Redmond, C. D., and Elberg, E. L.Sedimentary geology of Saudi Arabia. In: The geology of the Arabian Peninsula. USGS Paper No. 560-D., 177p (1967).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sadooni, F. N. (2). Stratigraphic Sequence, Microfacies, and Petroleum Prospects of the Yamama Formation, Lower Cretaceous, Southern Iraq. Bulletin, 77 (1993).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tang, H. and White, C. D.Multivariate statistical log log-facies classification on a shallow marine reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Volume 61, Issues 2–4: 88–93 (2008).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310762
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310762
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error