1887

Abstract

Summary

Vibrator excitation is a cost-effective, high-quality, and environmentally friendly way to achieve a high-density, wide-azimuth seismic acquisition. However, since its excitation band is limited by mechanical properties, it is very challenging to get broadband seismic data using traditional vibrators and vibrator sweep signal design methods [ ]. Moreover, the large sidelobes of sweep signal autocorrelation wavelets are associated with strong noise, which may degrade the quality of acquired data. According to a literature review, the industry has achieved certain research findings on improving vibrator excitation. For the use of conventional vibrators, nonlinear low-frequency sweep signals have gradually been popularized and employed. However, since the optimal combination of wavelet morphology, low-frequency energy, and bandwidth is not achieved, there is still an opportunity for improvement in data quality. Therefore, using the Riker wavelet, a damped Riker wavelet with very small wavelet side lobes and a broad frequency bandwidth was developed. In addition, the nonlinear sweep signals were designed by combining this wavelet with the low-frequency sweep signal design principle. Comparative data analysis indicated that the sweep signals designed by this method have a better excitation effect.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310873
2023-06-05
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. NIYudong. Study and application of new vibroseis seismic prospecting methods[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. TaoZhifei, ZhaoYonglin, MaLei. Low frequency seismic and low frequency vibrator[J]. EGP, 2011, 21(2): 71–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. NicolasTellier, GillesCaradec, GillesOllivrin. Practical solutions for effective vibrator high-frequency generation [C]. SEG New Orleans Annual Meeting, 2015, 201–205.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ClaudioBagaini. Low-frequency vibroseis data with maximum displacement sweeps [J]. The Leading edge May, 2008, 27 (5): 582–591.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AntonZiolkowski. Review of vibroseis data acquisition and processing for better amplitudes: Adjusting the sweep and deconvolving for the time-derivative of the true groundforce[J].Geophysical Prospecting, 2010, 58(3): 41–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ZhangJian, HuLixin, ZhaoGuoyong, et al.Design method of low distortion broadband vibrator nonlinear sweep signal[P]. China, ZL201711111347.3.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. TaoZhifei. Study on improving quality of high-frequency output signal in vibroseis [J]. Equipment for Geophysical Prospecting, 2008, 18(2): 71–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ZhangHongle, WangMeisheng. A sweep signal to improve the characteristics of correlation wavelet [J]. Equipment for Geophysical Prospecting, 2006, 16 (s): 33–41.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310873
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202310873
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error