1887

Abstract

Summary

The advantages of geophysical imaging are widely appreciated by the archaeological community. Geophysics allows for the non-invasive detection and characterisation of archaeological targets, and also serves as a means of conveying the archaeological significance of a site to an interested audience. Survey data can make effective contributions to heritage management, whether they are used to plan excavations, restrict public access over sensitive sites, or presented as part of exhibitions. However, unlike excavated artefacts, which may be sufficiently robust to be handled, the presentation of geophysical data is entirely visual and thus risks excluding exhibition visitors — specifically those with a visual impairment and/or neurodiverse condition. Museum services are increasingly invested in improving EDI (Equity, Diversity, Inclusivity) practice, but the appreciation of geophysical data risks being overlooked. In this abstract, we review the geophysical, technical and functional considerations in converting ground-penetrating radar (GPR) timeslices into tactile surfaces, drawing on experience from neuroscience and design fields. The data we consider originate from a multi-platform archaeological survey over industrial foundations. We highlight the value of our tactile resources for widening participation in heritage communication, but also for any sector where public understanding of geoscience data is of critical importance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320009
2023-09-03
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Frandsen, S. [2018] A multi-platform geophysical investigation of an industrial archaeology site: microgravity surveying and modelling constrained by GPR and ERT applied at the former Elsecar gasworks (Elsecar, Barnsley, UK).MSc Exploration Geophysics, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds (Dissertation).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jarocka, E. Pruszynski, A. and Johansson, R.S. [2021]. Human touch receptors are sensitive to spatial details on the scale of single fingerprint ridges.Journal of Neuroscience, 41(16), 3622–3634.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lawson, R. and Bracken, S. [2011] Haptic object recognition: How important are depth cues and plane orientation?Perception, 40(5), 576–597.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Museums and Heritage Advisor [2022]. New research finds accessibility a top priority for majority of UK heritage organisations.https://tinyurl.com/yc588y47.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SalvatoreC. and WolbringG. [2022]. Coverage of disabled people in environmental-education-focussed academic literature.Sustainability, 14(3), 1211.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wheat, H.E., Goodwin, A.W. and Browning, A.S. [1995] Tactile Resolution: peripheral neural mechanisms underlying the human capacity to determine positions of objects contacting the fingerpad.Journal of Neuroscience, 15(8), 5582–5595.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320009
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error