1887

Abstract

Summary

Rigid boom electromagnetic surveys that use coil-coil configurations are often used to obtain information about the subsurface conductivity. Semi-analytic solutions help to simulate electromagnetic induction measurements for a large number of horizontally layered models, which can then be stored and used as a lookup table. This procedure is performed once and then used to find the corresponding model that produces the best data fit, eliminating the need for running numerous simulations in every minimization step of an inversion scheme for large field datasets. We apply this methodology to a numerical example and field data acquired in The Netherlands. Our results from both cases using the global search demonstrate its ability to estimate electrical conductivity distributions in two-layered models in a fast and accurate manner. Furthermore, we apply the workflow using a lookup table based on low induction number approximation-derived measurements. The outcome of implementing this methodology using the low induction number lookup table shows poor accuracy in the electrical conductivity estimations for both the numerical example and the field data in comparison to the semi-analytical approach.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320049
2023-09-03
2025-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Callegary, J.B., Ferré, T.P.A. and Groom, R.W. [2007] Vertical Spatial Sensitivity and Exploration Depth of Low-Induction-Number Electromagnetic-Induction Instruments. Vadose Zone Journal, 6(1), 158–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hendrickx, J., Borchers, B., Corwin, D., Lesch, S., Hilgendorf, A. and Schlue, J. [2002] Inversion of soil conductivity profiles from electromagnetic induction measurements: Theory and experimental verification. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66(3), 673–685. Type: Article.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. McNeill, J.D. [1980] Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Publisher: Geonics Limited Mississauga, ON, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Monteiro Santos, F.A., Triantaflis, J. and Bruzgulis, K. [2011] A spatially constrained 1D inversion algorithm for quasi-3D conductivity imaging: Application to DUALEM-421 data collected in a riverine plain. GEOPHYSICS, 76(2), B43–B53.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Taylor, R. [2023] EM Inductionhttps://dualem.com/documents/em-induction/.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. vonHebel, van derKruk, Huisman, Mester, Altdorff, Endres, Zimmermann, Garré and Vereecken [2019] Calibration, Conversion, and Quantitative Multi-Layer Inversion of Multi-Coil Rigid-Boom Electromagnetic Induction Data. Sensors, 19(21), 4753.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wait, J.R. [1962] A note on the electromagnetic response of a stratifed earth. GEOPHYSICS, 27(3), 382–385.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ward, S.H. and Hohmann, G.W. [1987] 4. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Werthmüller, D. [2017] An open-source full 3D electromagnetic modeler for 1D VTI media in Python: empymod. GEOPHYSICS, 82(6), WB9–WB19.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320049
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320049
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error