1887

Abstract

Summary

The Mactaquac hydroelectric generating station, located near Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada has served as a test site for the development of geophysical dam condition monitoring techniques, for close to a decade. Efforts have focused on the region spanning the interface between the clay-till core of the dam and the wall of the adjacent concrete diversion sluice-way. Distributed temperature sensing (DTS) in a borehole drilled into the concrete suggests preferential seepage is present at relatively shallow depth. Since 2019 we have implemented time-lapse electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) – seeking to use seasonal changes in resistivity of the reservoir water as a tracer for imaging regions of preferential seepage through the core. Between April and December 2022, the resistivity of water in the reservoir varied by nearly a factor of four, being most resistive (∼300 Ohm-m) in the spring following snow melt, and most conductive (∼75 Ohm-m) in mid-August due to both elevated temperature and total dissolved solids (TDS). Order-of-magnitude estimates for seepage flux are found from the time lag between resistivity changes measured in the reservoir and correlated changes imaged in the core. Seepage estimates within the upper core are significantly higher than expected, corroborating prior inferences from the DTS system.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320152
2023-09-03
2025-03-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ball, J., Chambers, J., Wilkinson, P. and Binley, A. [2022] Resistivity imaging of river embankments: 3D effects due to varying water levels in tidal rivers.Near Surface Geophysics, 21, 93– 110, https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12234.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boulay, D., and Butler, K.E. [2021] Overcoming signal-to-noise challenges with pole-dipole resistivity monitoring at a hydroelectric dam site. Extended abstract, EAGE Near Surface Geoscience Conference & Exhibition 2021, 5 pp., Aug. 29–Sep. 2, Bordeaux, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Holmes, J., Chambers, J., Meldrum, P., Wilkinson, P., Boyd, J., Williamson, P., Huntley, D., Sattler, K., Elwood, D., Sivakumar, V., Reeves, H. and Donohue, S. [2020] Four- dimensional electrical resistivity tomography for continuous, near-real-time monitoring of a landslide affecting transport infrastructure in British Columbia, Canada.Near Surface Geophysics, 18, 337–351.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Johansson, S. and Dahlin, T. [1996] Seepage monitoring in an earth embankment dam by repeated resistivity measurements.European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1(3), 229–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Norooz, R., Olsson, P.-I., Dahlin, T., Günther, T., and Bernstone, C. [2021] A geoelectrical pre-study of Älvkarleby test embankment dam: 3D forward modelling and effects of structural constraints on the 3D inversion model of zoned embankment dams.Journal of Applied Geophysics, 191, 104355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104355.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sjödahl, P., Dahlin, T. and Johansson, S. [2009] Embankment dam seepage evaluation from resistivity monitoring data.Near Surface Geophysics7(5–6), 463–474.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Yun, T., Butler, K.E. and MacQuarrie, K.T.B. [2022] Investigation of seepage near the interface between an embankment dam and a concrete structure: monitoring and modelling of seasonal temperature trends.Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 60(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2022-0169.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320152
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320152
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error