1887

Abstract

Summary

To evaluate the feasibility of P- and SV-wave imaging of a complex groundwater system using there-component nodal receivers and a distributed acoustic sensing - DAS system, a 2D seismic survey was conducted. An electrically driven seismic vibrator operating in both P- and SV-wave mode was used as the source. Both raw receiver gathers and stacked seismic sections of the DAS data show presence of P-wave reflections from the P-wave mode source operation, with the stacked section showing discontinuous basement and a shallow seated reflector likely originating from the subsurface clay-sand/gravel contact. The P-wave DAS results are consistent with the vertical component data of the nodal receivers, but of lower quality. The S-wave stacked sections obtained from the source operating in the SV-wave mode for both DAS and radial component of the nodal receivers show consistent reflectors of the same quality. All results obtained suggest an undulating weathered bedrock topography controlling the conditions within the aquifer, consistent with borehole data indicating that, with adequate coupling, DAS using straight fiber optic cable is capable of recording both P- and S-waves.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320182
2023-09-03
2026-02-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brodic, B., R. D.Kunder, P.Ras, J. V.den Berg, and Malehmir, A. [2019]. Seismic Imaging Using Electromagnetic Vibrators - Storm versus Lightning. NSG2019 25th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brodic, B., A.Malehmir, C.Juhlin, L.Dynesius, M.Bastani, and Palm, H. [2015]. Multicomponent broadband digital-based seismic landstreamer for near-surface applications. J. Appl. Geophys., 123, 227–241,
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Malinowski, M., S.Heinonen, N.Putkinen, E.Koskela, V.Laakso, and Bos, J. [2022]. Multicomponent Seismic Acquisition for the Characterization of the Complex Multiaquifer System at Kurikka, Western Finland: NSG2022 28th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Spikes, K. T., N.Tisato, T. E.Hess, and J.Holt, W. [2019]. Comparison of geophone and surface-deployed distributed acoustic sensing seismic data. Geophys., 84, A25–A29.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Urosevic, M., A.Bona, S.Ziramov, R.Pevzner, K.Tertyshnikov, R.Martin, J.Dwyer, D.Felding, C.Guarin, and Foley, A. [2019]. Seismic Exploration of Mineral Resources in Western Australia with Distribute Acoustic Sensing. NSG2019 25th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Willis, M. E. [2022]. Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Seismic Measurements – What Geophysicists and Engineers Need to Know. SEG, pp 162, ISBN 978-1-56080-086-6. https://wiki.helsinki.fi/display/FLEX/Large-N+Devices)
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320182
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202320182
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error