1887

Abstract

Summary

Ultra-High Resolution seismic images are more and more commonly used before installing an offshore wind turbine. The small sampling recorded by the dedicated acquisitions enables to image the subsurface with a resolution lower than 1 meter. To fully appreciate this resolution, comprehensive data processing and imaging must be applied, compensating for sea state variation and possible navigation uncertainties. Removing the ghost energy and stabilizing the emitted wavelet are crucial steps to retrieve the full resolution of the data, increasing bandwidth on both low and high frequency sides. The limited recorded information in the low frequency, below 100Hz, can be recovered through velocity model building, enabling further acoustic and possibly elastic inversion.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202321022
2023-11-14
2025-11-12

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202321022
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cooper, J., Poole, G., Wombell, R. and Wang, P. [2015] Recursive model-based water-layer demultiple, 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Tu N114 02.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox, P., Mauritzen, E.K., Fogg, A., Salek, P., Ward, R. and Hulks, G. [2022] Broadband Processing Across The Uhrs Bandwidth-A Case Study From a Baltic Sea Offshore Windfarm, 28th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics NSG2022 (Vol. 2022, No. 1, pp. 1–5).
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Monrigal, O., de Jong, I. and Duarte, H. [2017] An ultra‐high‐resolution 3d marine seismic system for detailed site investigation, Near Surface Geophysics, 15(4), pp.335–345.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Power, P. T., Clare, M., Rushton, D., and Rattley, M. [2011] Reducing geo-risks for offshore Developments, Geotechnical Safety and Risk. ISGSR 2011, 217–224.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Karkov, K.H., Dalgaard, E., Diaz, A.T., Duarte, H., Hansen, H.J., Hviid, S., van Gilse, N.H., Krogh, L., Kuppens, S., Salaün, G. and Correia, F. [2022] Case study: AVO inversion and processing of ultrahigh resolution seismic for a windfarm application, 83rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition (Vol. 2022, No. 1, pp. 1–5).
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Kluesner, J., Brothers, D., Hart, P., Miller, N., Hatcher, G [2018] Practical approaches to maximizing the resolution of sparker seismic reflection data, Marine Geophysical Research, 40(3), 279–301.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Poole, G., King, S. and Cooper, J., [2018] Recent advances in hydrophone-only receiver deghosting, 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition (Vol. 2018, No. 1, pp. 1–5).
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ramani, K., Rickett, J., Smith, P., Cooke, A., Narayan, A., Chrustek, G and Watterson, P., [2022] Mitigating Impact of Wave-Height on Ultra-High Resolution Seismic Data Processing, 83rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition (Vol. 2022, No. 1, pp. 1–5).
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Verschuur, D. J., Berkhout, A. J. and Wapenaar, C. P. A. [1992] Adaptive surface-related multiple attenuation.Geophysics, 57(9), 1166–1177.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202321022
Loading
Ultra-High Resolution Seismic Processing and Imaging for Offshore Wind Farm Application
Conference Proceedings 2023, 1 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202321022
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202321022
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202321022
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error