1887

Abstract

Summary

We present examples of multiphysics inversion of CO2 saturation using combination of seismic, CSEM and gravimetry data. The examples deals with synthetic and real data at Sleipner and Smeaheia et shows that resistivity inputs are crucial to quantify CO2 saturation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202321094
2023-11-14
2025-07-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. •Brie, A., F.Pampuri, A.Marsala, and O.Meazza, 1995. Shear sonic interpretation in gas-bearing sands: Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 701–710.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. •Dupuy, B., Romdhane, A., Eliasson, P., and Yan, H. (2021a). Combined geophysical and rock physics workflow for quantitative CO2 monitoring.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 106, 103217.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. •Dupuy, B., Romdhane, A., Nordmann, P. L., Eliasson, P., and Park, J. (2021b). Bayesian rock physics inversion: application to CO2 storage monitoring.Geophysics, 86(4), 1–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. •Park, J., M.Fawad, I.Viken, E.Aker, and T. I.Bjørnarå (2013), CSEM sensitivity study for Sleipner CO2-injection monitoring: Energy Procedia, 37, 4199–4206.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202321094
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202321094
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error