1887

Abstract

Summary

Almost a decade now in the Levantine Basin (offshore israel) major gas discoveries reveal the potential of the basin. Most of the discoveries were base on observed seismic anomalies. Multiple DHIs were the driving force for the successful exploration drilling campaigns. However, the nature of the seismic anomalies can be different depending on the different Tamar sands. That can be a challenging for future interpreters for identifying the correct DHI for the appropriate interval. In this paper the nature of those DHIs is going to be explained. Rock physics and AVO modeling performed for interpreting the nature of the DHIs. the geophysical forward modeling will prove the nature of the DHIs and can help future interpreters avoid interpretation pitfalls.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202330007
2023-12-04
2025-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Batzle, M. L., & Wang, Z. (1992). Seismic properties of pore fluids.Geophysics64, 1396–1408.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gassmann, F. (1951). Über die elastizität poröser medien:Vierteljahrss-chrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich.1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Needham, D., Pettingrill, H., & Christensen, C. (2017). he Tamar Giant Gas Field: opening the subsalt Miocene gas play in the Levant Basin. In: Giant fields of the decade 2000–2010.AAPG Memoir113, p. 221–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. White, R. (1980). partial coherence matching of synthetic seismograms with seismic traces.Geophysical Prospecting, 28, 333–358.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202330007
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202330007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error