1887

Abstract

Summary

SP chemical flooding using seawater is a less complex approach to chemical flooding than ASP flooding. The main deficiency of SP flooding is the potential higher surfactant requirement; however, the avoidance of complex water treatment, large amounts of chemicals required, and scaling anticipated with ASP makes SP the likely more feasible option. In this paper, the development of a simple to implement seawater based chemical formulation for application in field pilot in a high temperature (90°C) and high salinity reservoir (> 200,000 TDS) is described.

Formulations containing mixtures of different surfactants have been evaluated using phase behavior in contact with oil, and aqueous phase stability experiments. The IFT reduction of some of the most promising formulations were subsequently evaluated using spinning drop method. Core floods were conducted to ultimately evaluate the ability of the most promising formulations to recover oil remaining after water flood. In addition, the long-term stability of these formulations was evaluated.

Core floods were conducted in outcrop and reservoir rock with the most promising identified surfactant formulations. Some of the experiments used a seawater preflush while other experiments injected the SP formulation directly after a waterflood with high salinity formation water. All corefloods used an SP slug mixed in seawater followed by a polymer chase that is also mixed in seawater (i.e. without a salinity gradient). From the corefloods it is concluded that these formulations can successfully mobilize residual oil left after water flood with formation water from reservoir rock at 90°C without the need for a pre-flush. Removing the need for a pre-flush reduces complexity, time, and effort for a potential implementation of SP in the field.

Although the concept presented in this paper have been introduced earlier, the application to high temperature and high salinity reservoir settings is novel.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331008
2023-10-02
2025-06-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1.Al-Mayan, H., Winkler, M., Kamal, D.S., AlMahrooqi, S., and E.AlMaraghi. “Integrated EOR Screening of Major Kuwait Oil Fields Using Qualitative, Quantitative and Risk Screening Criteria.”, presented at the SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Oman, March 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/179751-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.Al-Dhuwaihi, A.S., Tiwari, S., Baroon, B., AlAbbas, R., Al-Ajmi, M., De Bruijn, G., Nabulsi, R., Abu Shiekah, I., Glasbergen, G., and van Batenburg, D.W., (2022), “Mapping Chemical EOR Technologies to Different Reservoir Settings at Harsh Conditions in North Kuwait”, presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery ConferenceApril 2022. https://doi.org/10.2118/209471-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.Carlisle, C., Al Maraghi, E., Al Sad, Bader., Britton, C., Fortenberry, R., and Pope, G.: “One-Spot Pilot Results in the Sabriyah-Mauddud Carbonate Formation in Kuwait Using a Novel Surfactant Formulation,” SPE 169153-MS, presented at the SPE IOR Symposium, April 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169153-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.Al-Dhuwaihi, A. S., Abdullah, M. B., Tiwari, S., Al-Murayri, M. T., Al-Mayyan, H., Shahin, G.T., and S.Shukla, “Fit-for-Purpose Chemical EOR ASP Modeling Strategy to Guide Pilot Development Decisions for a Giant Reservoir in North Kuwait.”, presented at the SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, October 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/186351-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.Al-Murayri, M.T., Kamal, D.S., Al-Mayyan, H., Shahin, G.T., Shukla, S., and A.B.G.M. TenBerge. (2018b) “De-Risking Multi-Well ASP EOR Pilot in a Challenging Clastic Reservoir in Kuwait Following Successful Implementation of a One-Spot EOR Pilot”, presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi,UAE, November 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/193027-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.Al-Murayri, M.T., Kamal, D.S., Baroon, H.F., Shahin, G.T., and S.R.Shukla. (2019a), “Evolution of a Lab-Optimized ASP Formulation for a High Temperature and High Salinity World-Class Clastic Reservoir in the Middle East.” presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, March 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/194977-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.Al-Murayri, M.T., Kamal, D.S., Khan, M.Y., Al-Mayyan, H.E., Abu Shiekah, I.M., Shahin, G.T., Shukla, S.R., Bouwmeester, R.M., De Kruijf, A., “Alleviation of Scaling Concerns and Controlling of Chemical EOR Under-Performance Risk for a Giant Sandstone Reservoir in North Kuwait”, Paper presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, November 11–14, 2019. Paper Number: SPE-197249-MS, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/197249-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.Mohammed T. Al-Murayri, M.T., Sulaiman, D.S., Al-Kharji, A., Al Kabani, M., Sorbie, K.S., Ness, G., Pitts, M.J., Salehi, M., “Scale Mitigation for Field Implementation of Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer ASP Flooding in a Heterogeneous High Temperature Carbonate Reservoir with High Divalent Cation Concentration in Formation Water”, Paper presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 2021, Paper Number: SPE-207573-MS, https://doi.org/10.2118/207573-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.Southwick, J.G., van Rijn, C., van den Pol, E., van Batenburg, D.W., Azhan, A., Kalantar, A., and Zulkifli, N., “Advantages of an APS/AES Seawater-Based Surfactant Polymer Formulation.” SPE J.25 (2020): 3494–3506. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/190296-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.Harris, R.R., Paramanathan, S., Dickson, S.J., Bouwmeester, R.C., Southwick, J.G., Keijzer, E., van Rijn, C.H., and van Batenburg, D.W., “Evaluation of Seawater Based Surfactant Polymer Formulation in a Single Well Test Offshore”, Paper presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, August 31–September 4, 2020. Paper Number: SPE-200352-MS, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/200352-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.Talley, L. D.1988. Hydrolytic Stability of Alkoxyether Sulfates.SPE Res Eng3(1): 235–242. SPE-14912-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/14912-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.J.R.Barnes, D.W. vanBatenburg, J.G.Southwick, C.H.T. vanRijn, S.G.J.Pieterse, E.Keijzer, M.L.Brewer, T.E.King, “Stability of Alcohol Propoxy Sulfate surfactant in the presence of reservoir rock”, Poster presented at: Virtual 2020 AOCS Annual Meeting & Expo, June 29–July 3, 2020;
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.T.Matsuura, W.M.Stoll, D.W. vanBatenburg, J.N.M vanWunnik, and P.M.Boerrigter, “Modelling ASP Flooding Using X-ray CT Core Flooding Experiments”, Paper Th A13, Presented at EAGE IOR 2015 – 18th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Dresden Germany, April 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.S.Berg, S.Oedai, D.W. vanBatenburg, K.Elewaut, and D.M.Boersma, “Visualization ASP Coreflood Experiments Using X-ray CT Imaging”, Paper Th B12, Presented at EAGE IOR 2015 – 18th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Dresden Germany, April 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.D.W. vanBatenburg, S.Berg, S.Oedai, L.L.David, A.O.N.Siemens, and K.Elewaut, “Visualization of Light Oil Mobilization in ASP Core Floods using X-ray CT Imaging”, SPE 174660, Presented at SPE Enhaced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, August 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.D.W. vanBatenburg, S.Berg, S.Oedai, and K.Elewaut, “Visualization of Oil Mobilization in ASP Core Floods using X-ray CT Imaging”, SPE 175407, Presented at SPE Kuwait Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Mishref, Kuwait, October 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.Ten Berge, A.B.G.M., Lenchenkov, N., Wever, D.A., Farajzadeh, R., Al-Mjeni, R., Glasbergen, G., “The Role of Synthetic Polymer on Rock-Fluid Interactions and the Resulting Change in Ionic Composition and Viscosity of the Polymer Slug for a cEOR Flood in the Sultanate of Oman”, Paper presented at the SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, March, 2018. Paper Number: SPE-190391-MS, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/190391-MS
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331008
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error