1887

Abstract

Summary

The paper describes the process to model a large waterflood field located in Montana using a workflow that creates a predictive model from production and injection historical data to infer petrophysical parameters in a reduced period of time while honoring the reservoir physics at all times; data from 2010 was used to create a layered model which was later used for proactively managing the field as well as for optimization purposes. Different workflows have been carried out using the model for surveillance and forecasting, as well as generating the pareto front and selecting a target scenario to increase production by redistribution and implementing its prescriptions in the field.

The workflow aims at significantly reducing the time spent in creating a model by blending traditional reservoir physics with modern data science techniques (AI and Machine Learning) to create a continuous model able to replicate the field behavior. Because the model runs very fast (minutes) it can be used for day to day management and optimization of the field. The former is achieved by proactively using the base case model to create scenarios of various operational decisions; the latter leverages evolutionary algorithms to run thousands of variations of the base case with the objective of finding the optimal operational injection strategy (pareto front) which was later implemented in the field.

These functionalities were put to work in the implementation of a closed-loop optimization workflow in which the input data and the model are updated frequently, maintaining an evergreen model of the field which can be used to run “what-if” scenarios in minutes and generate the pareto as mentioned above. Some of the what-if scenarios evaluated the impact of operational decisions like injection changes, wells shut-in, inactive well reactivation and a thorough injection sensitivity analysis to quantify the impact of each injector and rank them by importance. The pareto was generated running the model more than 15000 times and three optimum scenarios were assessed for implementation. The final implementation is in place and the initial results encouraging, validating the predictive ability of the model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331040
2023-10-02
2024-10-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CaladC.et al.2022. Maximizing Production and Storage in CO2 Injection Supported by a Physics Embedded Machine Learning.Presented at the Second EAGE Workshop on EOR in the Americas. Oct 2022
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Calad, C. et al, 2022. An Optimized Injection Scenario in a Waterflood Increases Oil Production and Reduces Carbon Emissions Intensity. Poster 2.08.Presented at the Second EAGE Digitalization Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria. Mar 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gutierrez, F., et al.2022. Optimizing a Waterflood Using a Combination of Machine Learning and Reservoir Physics.A Field application for Reducing Water Injection With No Impact on Oil Production and Improved Carbon Intensity. 22IPTC-22406-MS. Presented at IPTC 2022 in Riyadh, KSA, Feb 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Rafiee, J. et al, 2021. Physics Embedded Machine Learning for Producer to Injector Conversion Optimization in Waterfloods: A Field Application.Presented at EAGE Annual 82nd Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Oct 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Calad, C., Gutiérrez, F., Pastor P., Sarma, Tachyus Corporation. Combining Machine Learning with Traditional Reservoir Physics for Predictive Modeling and Optimization of a Large Mature Waterflood Project in the Gulf of San Jorge Basin in Argentina.SPE-199048-MS, presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, July 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Calad P. et al, 2020. Evaluation of A Cyclic Water Injection Program Using a Combination Of Artificial Intelligence And Reservoir Physics.SPE-201288-MS, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, Oct 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sarma et al, 2017. Redistribution of Steam Injection in Heavy Oil Reservoir Management to Improve EOR Economics, powered by a Unique Integration of Reservoir Physics and Machine Learning. SPE-185507-MS. Presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, ARG, May 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  8. S.Kyriacou et al, 2017. Constrained, Multi-objective, Steamflood Injection Redistribution Optimization, using a Cloud-distributed, Metamodel-assisted, Memetic Optimization Algorithm. SPE-186010-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Aranha, Claus, RyojiTanabe, RomainChassagne, and AlexFukunaga. 2015. “Optimization of Oil Reservoir Models Using Tuned Evolutionary Algorithms and Adaptive Differential Evolution.” In 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). doi:10.1109/cec.2015.7256983.
    https://doi.org/10.1109/cec.2015.7256983 [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331040
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331040
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error