1887

Abstract

Summary

When a higher mobility fluid displaces a lower mobility fluid, viscous fingers will generally occur. The objective of this study is to include correct modelling of viscous instabilities as part of an improved description of gas injection and WAG processes. The approach has been applied to immiscible (IM), near miscible (NM) and miscible (M) situations.

The numerical modelling was made using a commercial reservoir simulator, GEM/CMG. The methodology of describing viscous fingering, like in , is a 4-stage approach: (1) selection of fractional flow to maximize total mobility; (2) derivation of the relative permeability; (3) establishing an appropriate random correlated permeability field; and (4) simulating the process with a sufficiently fine grid. Simulations have been performed with 1D (for calibration) and 2D models using fine grid and random Gaussian permeability field.

All three fluid models had the same composition (CO2 for the injected gas and 4 pseudo-components for the oil), phase viscosities and densities at initial pressure and temperature. The binary interaction parameters were modified to control the different miscible conditions.

Numerical 1-D cases were used as a first calibration of immiscible, near-miscible, and miscible, gas injection and WAG. The miscible case performed as expected, with approx. 100 percent oil recovery around 1 pore volume injected. The near miscible case showed earlier gas breakthrough, and the immiscible case a very early gas breakthrough due to the high mobility relative permeability supporting the viscous instability. In the 2-D model, viscous fingers occur in all cases (IM, NM, and M) both during gas injection and WAG slug injections (slug size 0.1 PV). For the IM and NM cases, gravity segregation of the gas phase combines with viscous instability to create a finger at the reservoir top and accelerate gas breakthrough. This, however, does not happen to the miscible case, where the viscous fingers are composed of rich CO2 oil, much less viscous, but similar in density with the original oil. Miscibility also slows the propagation velocity of the viscous fingers, to some degree, due to mass exchange effects. In all cases, hysteresis effects associated with WAG dampened the formation of viscous fingers and improved recovery.

The main contribution of this work is a new approach to include a more correct modelling of viscous fingers in gas and WAG injections at immiscible, near-miscible and miscible conditions. This is the first paper combining compositional WAG with the methodology for viscous fingering.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331049
2023-10-02
2024-10-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beteta, A., Sorbie, K.S. and Skauge, A., [2022a] Immiscible Viscous Fingering: The Simulation of Tertiary Polymer Displacements of Viscous Oils in 2D Slab Floods, Polymers, 14, 4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194159
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beteta, A., Sorbie, K.S., McIver, K., Johnson, G., Gasimov, R. and van Zeil, W., [2022b] The role of immiscible fingering on the mechanism of secondary and tertiary polymer flooding of viscous oil, Transport in Porous Media, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01774-8
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beteta, A., Sorbie, K.S.Skauge, A., and Skauge, T., [2023] Immiscible Viscous Fingering: Effects of Wettability/Capillarity and Scaling, Transp.Porous Media, TIPM.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlson, F.M. [1981] Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis to the Non-Wetting Phase, SPE10157, Presented at the 56th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Oct. 5ߝ7, 1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Christensen, J.R., Stenby, E.H., and Skauge, A.: Review of WAG Field Experience, [1998a] SPE 39883, proceedings from the 1998 SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico held in Villahermosa, Mexico, 3–5 March 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Christensen, J.R., Stenby, E.H., Skauge, A. [1998b] ‘Compositional and Relative Permeability Effects on Near-Miscible WAG’, SPE 39627, proceedings from the 1998 SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, 19–22 April 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Christensen, J.R., Stenby, E.H. and Skauge, A. [2001] Review of WAG Field Experience, SPE 71203, SPERE &E Journal, 97–106, April 2001, http://doi.org/10.2118/71203-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CMG [2022], CMG-GEM technical manual, Computer Modelling Group
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coats, K. H. [1980] An Equation of State Compositional Model’, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 20(05), 363–376.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Joubert, T., Duchenne, S., Bourgeois, M., de Loubens, R., and Petitfrere, M. [2017] Experimental Data acquisition and Modeling for the Study of Miscible CO2 WAG in Carbonate Reservoirs under Oil-wet Conditions, SPE-188471, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Nov. 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Land, C. S. [1968] Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (June 1968), Pet. Trans. AIME253, 149–156, 1968.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Larsen, J. A., and Skauge, A. [1998] Methodology for Numerical Simulation with Cycle-Dependent Relative Permeabilities, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, June 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Larsen, J.A., and Skauge, A. [1999] Simulation of the Immiscible WAG Process using Cycle-Dependent Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities.Society of Petroleum Engineers, paper SPE 56475, ATC&E, 3–6 Oct.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Macleod, D. B., Trans. Farad. Soc., 19, 38 (1923).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rios, V.S., Santos, L.O.S., Quadros, F.B., Schiozer, D.J. [2019] New upscaling technique for compositional reservoir simulations of miscible gas injection, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 175, 389–406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.061.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Salmo, I.C., Pettersen, Ø, and Skauge, A. [2017] Polymer Flooding at Adverse Mobility Ratio – Acceleration of Oil Production by Crossflow into Water Channels; Energy Fuels, 2017. 31 (6), pp 5948–5958, http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00515
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Salmo, I., Alzaabi, M. A., Sorbie, K., Skauge, A. [2022]: Modelling Immiscible Viscous Fingering: History Match of Water Flood at Different Adverse Mobility Ratio.Transp. in Porous Med.145, 291–322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01847-8
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Skauge, A., and Larsen, J.A. [1994] Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities and Trapped Gas Measurements Related to WAG Processes, presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysists, Stavanger, September 12–14, 1994. proceeding paper Society of Core Analysts, SCA 9421.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Skauge, A., Veland, I., and Larsen, J.A. [1999] Factors influencing Three-Phase Flow Parameters in WAG Experiments, 1999.reviewed proceedings, paper SCA 9932, Society of Core Analysts Symposium, August 1–4, 1999. Golden Colorado.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Skauge, A., Ottesen, B., Spildo, K., Pourmohammadi, S., and Hetland, S. [2008] Comparing wettability for carbonates and sandstone reservoirs, 10th International Symposium on Evaluation of Wettability and Its Effect on Oil Recovery, Abu Dhabi.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SkaugeA., SorbieK., OrmehaugP.A., SkaugeT. [2009] Experimental and Numerical Modeling Studies of Viscous Unstable Displacement, paper A28, proceedings from Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Paris, France, April 27–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Skauge, A. and Sorbie, K. [2014] Status of Fluid Flow Mechanisms for Miscible and Immiscible WAG, paper SPE 169747, SPE EOR Conference at Oil & Gas West Asia (OGWA), 31 March–2 April 2014, Muscat, Oman, https://doi.org/10.2118/169747-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Skauge, A., Sorbie, K.S., van Dijke, R. [2019] Modelling the Transition between Immiscible and Miscible WAG, 2019. EAGE IOR 2019, Pau, France, paper, 151, Apr. 8, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Skauge, A., Sorbie, K.S., Salmo, I.C., Skauge, T. [2021] Systematic Modelling of Unstable Displacement, 2021. SPE-207493-MS, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Nov 15–18, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2118/207493-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SkaugeA., SkaugeT., SorbieK.S., BourgeoisM., ChangP.L., [2022] Impact of Viscous Instabilities on WAG Displacement, SPE-211448-MS, presented at 2022 ADIPEC, Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, https://doi.org/10.2118/211448-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SorbieK.S., SkaugeA. [2019] Mobilization of By-Passed Oil by Viscous Crossflow in EOR Processes, IOR 2019, EAGE IOR Pau, France, paper 155, Apr. 8, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sorbie, K.S., Al Ghafri, A. Y., Skauge, A., and Mackay, E.J. [2020] On the Modelling of Immiscible Viscous Fingering in Two Phase Flow in Porous Media, Transport in Porous Media, 2020. 135, pages 331–359 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-020-01479-w
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Stalkup, F.I. Jr. [1983] Status of Miscible Displacement, J Pet Technol35(04): 815–826. https://doi.org/10.2118/9992-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stone, H.L. [1970] Probability Model for Estimating Three-Phase Relative Permeability, J.Petr.Tech. (Feb. 1970) 214–218
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sugden, S., J. Chem. Soc., 125, 32 (1924).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, G., Pickup, G. E., Sorbie, K. S. and Mackay, E. J. [2018] “The Analysis of Compositional Effects on Global Flow Regimes in CO2 Near-Miscible Displacements in Heterogeneous Systems” in SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, G., Pickup, G. E., Sorbie, K. S., Mackay, E. J., and Skauge, A. [2019] Detailed Assessment of compositional and interfacial tension effects on the fluid behavior during immiscible and near-miscible CO2 continuous and WAG displacements, SPE Reservoir Simulation, SPE 193907, Galveston, 10–11 April 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zick, A., [1987] Combined Condensing/Vaporizing Mechanism in the Displacement of Oil by Enriched Gases”, SPE paper 15493 presented at 61st Annual Techn. Conf. and Exhibition of SPE, Dallas, 27–30 September.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331049
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331049
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error