1887

Abstract

Summary

Chalk is an important reservoir rock in the North Sea. However, the reservoirs are maturing, which increases the relevance of affordable improved oil recovery (IOR) solutions. Due to the limited availability of reservoir core material and the high cost of obtaining it, the use of representative outcrop samples is essential for parametric studies on reservoir wettability, capillary forces, relative permeability, oil recovery, and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) studies. The representative core material is also important for future studies on e.g., determining CO2 storage potential in the depleted reservoirs.

In this study, we have evaluated both physical and chemical properties of easily available outcrop chalk material, Stevns Klint (SK) and Aalborg (AA), and compared them against rock properties from North Sea reservoir chalks. The aim was to determine if any outcrop chalk can be used as an analogue to reservoir chalk for laboratory studies.

The petrophysical properties compared were porosity, permeability, BET surface area, and pore size distribution determined by mercury injection (MICP). Mineral surface composition was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and chromatography was used to describe the chemical reactivity of the mineral surfaces. All these properties are important for understanding and describing phase interactions and flow in porous media.

The two reservoir chalk showed very similar properties, and both chalk outcrops had comparable porosity, permeability, and pore size distributions to the reservoir chalk. SEM and EDX analyses revealed that SK chalk had similar grain texture and mineralogy to the reservoir chalk, whereas the AA chalk had significantly higher silica content giving it a different texture and mineralogy. The Opal-CT silica balls identified in AA chalk significantly increased its specific surface area compared to that in SK and reservoir chalk. Despite the larger surface area, the surface reactivity of AA chalk was lower than that of SK and reservoir chalk, confirming the importance of mineralogy on reservoir chemistry.

Spontaneous imbibition experimental results confirmed the chalk property observations. Because of different mineralogy, AA and SK chalk showed different chemical behavior under oil exposure, which could significantly influence core wettability during fluid restorations and the potential of wettability alteration by Smart Water EOR. It was concluded that SK outcrop chalk was a better analogue for the North Sea reservoir chalk compared to AA chalk. The screening methodology suggested in this paper could also be used for screening outcrop material as good analogues for reservoir limestones.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331068
2023-10-02
2024-10-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fathi, S. J., Austad, T., & Strand, S. (2011). Effect of water-extractable carboxylic acids in crude oil on wettability in carbonates. Energy & Fuels, 25(6), 2587–2592. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef200302d
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fathi, S. J., Austad, T., Strand, S., & Puntervold, T. (2010). Wettability alteration in carbonates: The effect of water-soluble carboxylic acids in crude oil. Energy & Fuels, 24(5), 2974–2979. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901527h
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Flörke, O. W., Hollmann, R., von Rad, U., & Rösch, H. (1976). Intergrowth and twinning in opal-CT lepispheres. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 58(3), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402354
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Frykman, P. (2001). Spatial variability in petrophysical properties in Upper Maastrichtian chalk outcrops at Stevns Klint, Denmark. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 18(10), 1041–1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(01)00043-5
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hopkins, P. A., Omland, I., Layti, F., Strand, S., Puntervold, T., & Austad, T. (2017). Crude Oil Quantity and Its Effect on Chalk Surface Wetting. Energy & Fuels, 31(5), 4663–4669. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02914
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Khan, M. A. I., Kleiberg, S. H., Pinerez Torrijos, I. D., Puntervold, T., & Strand, S. (2023). Carbonated Smart Water Injection for Optimized Oil Recovery in Chalk at High Temperature. E3S Web Conf., 367, 01008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336701008
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Khan, M. A. I., Piñerez Torrijos, I. D., Aldeen, S. H., Puntervold, T., & Strand, S. (2022). Polysulphate: A New Enhanced Oil Recovery Additive to Maximize the Oil Recovery From Carbonate Reservoirs at High Temperature. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2118/211443-pa
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Khan, M. A. I., Strand, S., & Puntervold, T. (2021). Transportation of Alkalinity in Sandstone for EOR Purpose. 2021(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202113083
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Khan, M. A. I., Strand, S., Puntervold, T., & Mamonov, A. (2023). Positive Capillary Forces: The Key for Optimized Oil Recovery in Low-Permeable Cores SCA, Abu Dhabi.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Khan, M. A. I., Torrijos, I. D. P., Tahmiscioğlu, A. N., Ullah, H., Puntervold, T., & Strand, S. (2023). Comparing Inexpensive, Customized Brine Compositions for Enhanced Oil Recovery in High Temperature Outcrop and Reservoir Chalk. [Under Review]. Energy & Fuels (Submitted).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Khan, M. A. I., Torrijos, I. D. P., Zhang, M., Strand, S., & Puntervold, T. (2023). Modified Produced Water as Enhanced Oil Recovery Fluid in High-Temperature Chalk. Energy & Fuels (Submitted).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Klewiah, I., Piñerez Torrijos, I. D., Strand, S., Puntervold, T., & Konstantinopoulos, M. (2019, 2019/5/13/). Adsorption of Crude Oil Polar Components onto Silica-Rich Chalk and its Impact on Wetting SPE Norway One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway. https://doi.org/10.2118/195603-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Konstantinopoulos, M., Piñerez Torrijos, I. D., Klewiah, I., Strand, S., & Puntervold, T. (2019). Effect of Mineralogy on Initial Wettability and Oil Recovery from Silica-containing Chalk. 2019(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900956
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Korsnes, R. I., Strand, S., Hoff, Ø., Pedersen, T., Madland, M. V., & Austad, T. (2006). Does the chemical interaction between seawater and chalk affect the mechanical properties of chalk?EUROCK 2006 - Multiphysics Coupling and Long Term Behaviour in Rock Mechanics - ISBN 0 415 41001 0, Taylor & Francis Group, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mamonov, A., Khan, M. A., Puntervold, T., & Strand, S. (2018). Optimized Alkalinity for EOR Purposes in Sandstone Reservoirs. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition,
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mjos, J. E. S., Strand, S., Puntervold, T., & Gaybaliyev, H. (2018, 2018/3/26/). Effect of Initial Wetting on Smart Water Potential in Carbonates Paper presented at the 2018 SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Oman. https://doi.org/10.2118/190414-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Piñerez Torrijos, I. D., Mamonov, A., Strand, S., & Puntervold, T. (2020). The role of polar organic components in dynamic crude oil adsorption on sandstones and carbonates. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro, 10(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.251
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Puntervold, T., Khan, M. A. I., Torrijos, I. D. P., & Strand, S. (2022). Is Smart Water Flooding Smarter Than Seawater Flooding in a Fractured Chalk Reservoir?SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, https://doi.org/10.2118/210042-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Puntervold, T., Strand, S., Ellouz, R., & Austad, T. (2015). Modified seawater as a smart EOR fluid in chalk. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 133, 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.06.034
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Shariatpanahi, S. F., Hopkins, P., Aksulu, H., Strand, S., Puntervold, T., & Austad, T. (2016). Water based EOR by wettability alteration in dolomite. Energy & Fuels, 30(1), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02239
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Standnes, D. C., & Austad, T. (2000). Wettability alteration in chalk: 1. Preparation of core material and oil properties. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 28(3), 111–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(00)00083-8
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Strand, S., Høgnesen, E. J., & Austad, T. (2006). Wettability alteration of carbonates—Effects of potential determining ions (Ca2+ and SO42-) and temperature. Colloids and Surfaces275(1–3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.10.061
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Strand, S., Standnes, D., & Austad, T. (2006). New wettability test for chalk based on chromatographic separation of SCN− and SO42−. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 52, 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.03.021
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tafur, N., Mamonov, A., Islam Khan, M. A., Soto, A., Puntervold, T., & Strand, S. (2023). Evaluation of Surface-Active Ionic Liquids in Smart Water for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbonate Rocks. Energy & Fuels, 37(16), 11730–11742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c01488
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331068
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202331068
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error