1887

Abstract

Summary

Carbon capture and sequestration in subsurface porous formations is a key technology to reduce CO2 emissions to reach the world net-zero emissions by 2050. Modelling studies to identify injection conditions which do not imply fault reactivation and induced seismicity are mandatory to support project implementation. Fault stability analysis requires to couple full-physics reservoir and geomechanical simulations, limiting the possibility to run multiple sensitivities due to the high computational cost. In this work, a cost-efficient workflow suitable for optimization and uncertainty quantification based on Functional Kriging (FK) surrogate models is proposed. Two different FK techniques are implemented and applied to two synthetic models, simulating CO2 sequestration in a depleted sweet gas reservoir using a compositional model with CH4 and CO2 as components. Field gas injection rate, fault modelling parameters but also geomechanical properties are considered as key variables to study fault reactivation. The proxies are trained on output from few simulations to estimate the time dependent Coulomb Failure Function on each element of the fault triangular mesh monitoring the fault behavior during the fluid injection. The results show that FK proxies accurately replicate fault stability indicators with low average errors on a set of blind simulations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202335009
2023-11-27
2026-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1.Petroselli, S., Rotella, D., Gemelli, F., Frabotta, G.M., Brignoli, M., Grilli, D., Corradi, A., and Mantica, S., [2023]. An analytical probabilistic approach for fault stability analysis during fluid injection: the safe tool methodology.ARMA23–654.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.Haghighat, E., Amini, D., and Juanes, R., [2022]. Physics-informed neural network simulation of multiphase poroelasticity using stress-split sequential training.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, volume 397.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.Jaeger, J.C., and Cook, N.G.W., [1979]. Fundamentals of rock mechanics (third edition). London, United Kingdom, Chapman and Hall, 593 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.Bottazzi, F., and Della Rossa, E., [2017], A functional data analysis approach to surrogate modeling in reservoir and geomechanics uncertainty quantification.Mathematical Geosciences, 49, 517–540.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.Stabile, C.C., Barbiero, M., Fighera, G., and Dovera, L., [2021]. Robust well placement optimization through universal trace kriging with adaptive sampling.Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference (ADIPEC) SPE-207233-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.Floris, F.J.T., Bush, M.D., Cuypers, M., Roggero, F., Syversveen, A-R., [1999]. Comparison of production forecast uncertainty quantification methods: an integrated study.Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Petroleum Geostatistics, Toulouse, France, April 20–23.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202335009
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202335009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error