1887

Abstract

Summary

Microseismic monitoring can provide important parameters for the evaluation of fracturing, water/gas injection production, and gas storage, etc. in oil and gas energy sector. Due to tiny magnitude and huge number of microseismics, their signals are generally drowned out in the background noise; thus, the traditional seismic location fails, which highlights the large arrived amplitude. Therefore, the methods of probability and statistics have to be used to identify and analyze microseismicity. In the principle and denoise of our vector scanning, we applied the correlation analysis to find the microseismicity, and periodic disturbance from a large number of records. In the real-time automation process of data collation, denoising, and interpretation, we determine the range and/or threshold of characteristic parameters of noise coherent based on data statistics. We also statistically integrate the random spatiotemporal distributions of energy released to suppress the residual and occasional noise coherence, and obtain the space-time geometry of the slit network with high probability connection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202335015
2023-11-27
2026-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK, RichardsP.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. W. H. Freeman and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BullenK.E and BoltB.1985. An introduction to the theory of Seismology, 4th edition, Cambridge. Cheng Q. 2003. Digital signal processing, Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. LiangB, et al.2023. Microseismic and its Monitoring-Toward Vector Scanning of Microseismic Based on Lower Signal to Noise Ratio.Progress in Geophysics.38(1): 47–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FengY. and LiangB.2023. A method to estimate the microseismic magnitude based on vector scanning.Progress in Earthquake Sciences.53(3):115–119
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FengY., LiangB., and WangW.2022. Monitoring for microseismicity induced by goaf collapse at coal mine.EAGE, Near Surface Geoscience Conference & Exhibition 2022, Geophysical Methods in Mining Engineering. Paper number 53. Belgrade, Serbia.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MaL, WangL, ShenY et al.2012. Vector Scanning: Hydro-fracture Monitoring With Surface Microseismic Data. SPE-152913, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MaxwellS.2014. Microseismic imaging of hydraulic fracturing: Improved Engineering of unconventional shale reservoirs. Distinguished instructor short course, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PressW, TeukolskyS., VetterlingW., et al.1997. Numerical Recipes in C, the art of scientific computing. 2nd Edition. Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ren ZC, Zheng BT, MaS, et al.2014. Hydro-Fracture Monitoring Using Vector Scanning With Surface Microseismic Data, AAPG-1948512, Istanbul, Turkey.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. RobinsonE.A., and TreitelS., 2000, Geophysical signal processing. SEG..
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SheriffR.E.1991. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Exploration Geophysics. Third Edition, SEG..
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WuZ, LuJ, ShenC, LiangB, 2014. Data Processing in Vector Scanning: Presented at SEG 1st International Microseismic Technology Workshop. Asheville, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202335015
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202335015
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error