1887

Abstract

Summary

This paper is presenting a comparison of two methods to quantify uncertainties on production profiles for unconventional reservoirs: the traditional method with type curves fitting and statistical analysis and the geostatistical method with time series decomposition and geostatistical interpolation. Both are applied on a true case study with several hundred wells data base. The results are in favor of geostatistical approach which provides very promising validations. some way forwards are suggested.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202335025
2023-11-27
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. [2]FenwickD., ScheidtC., and CaersJ., Quantifying asymmetric parameters interactions in sensitivity analysis, Mathematical Geosciences, May 2014, Vol 46, Issue 4, pp 493–511.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [3]GrujicO., Da SilvaC., CaersJ., Functional approach to data mining, forecasting, and uncertainty quantification in unconventional reservoirs, SPE-174849-MS, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [4]OurirA., OukmalJ., RondeleuxB., AgharzayevaZ., BarraultP., Hybrid Data Driven Approach for Reservoir Production Forecast, SPE-123456-MS, ADIPEC2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [5]Schlumberger Energy Glossary: https://glossary.slb.com/en/Terms/v/velocity_string.aspx.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [6]SPEE monograph 4: Estimating ultimate recovery of developed wells in low-permeability reservoirs.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202335025
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202335025
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error