Cluster Analysis for Hydrogeological Units Identification and Characterisation in Glaciofluvial Sediments

References

1. Bianchi, M. and Zheng, C. [2016] A lithofacies approach for modeling non-fickian solute transport in a heterogeneous alluvial aquifer.Water Resources Research, 52(1):552–565.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Carle, S. [1999] T-PROGS: Transition Probability Geostatistical Software Version 2.1.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Colombera, L., Mountney, N., Medici, G., and West, L. [2019] The geometry of fluvial channel bodies: Empirical characterization and implications for object-based models of the subsurface.AAPG Bulletin, 103.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Crooijmans, R.A., Willems, C.J.L., Nick, H.M. and Bruhn, D.F. [2016] The influence of facies heterogeneity on the doublet performance in low-enthalpy geothermal sedimentary reservoirs.Geothermics, 64, 209–219.
   [Google Scholar]
5. De Marsily, G., Delay, F., Goncalves, J., Renard, P., Teles, V., and Violette, S. [2005] Dealing with spatial heterogeneity.Hydrogeology Journal, 13.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dell’Arciprete, D., Bersezio, R., Felletti, F., Giudici, M., Comunian, A., and Renard, P. [2012] Comparison of three geostatistical methods for hydrofacies simulation: A test on alluvial sediments.Hydrogeology Journal, 20.
   [Google Scholar]
7. El-Deek, I., Abdullatif, I. and Korvin, G. [2017]. Heterogeneity analysis of reservoir porosity and permeability in the Late Ordovician glacio-fluvial Sarah Formation paleovalleys, central Saudi Arabia.Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gray, E., Hartley, A. and Howell, J. [2019] The influence of stratigraphy and facies distribution on reservoir quality and production performance in the Triassic Skagerrak Formation of the UK and Norwegian Central North Sea. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 494.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Koltermann, C. E. and Gorelick, S. M. [1996] Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits: A review of structure-imitating, process-imitating, and descriptive approaches.Water Resources Research, 32(9):2617–2658.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lee, S.-Y., Carle, S. F., and Fogg, G. E. [2007] Geologic heterogeneity and a comparison of two geostatistical models: Sequential gaussian and transition probability-based geostatistical simulation.Advances in Water Resources, 30(9):1914–1932.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Liu, G., Pu, H., Zhao, Z. and Liu, Y. [2019] Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling on well pairs in heterogeneous porous geothermal reservoirs.Energy, 171, 631–653.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Montero, J. M., Colombera, L., Yan, N., and Mountney, N. P. [2021] A workflow for modelling fluvial meander-belt successions: Combining forward stratigraphic modelling and multi-point geostatistics.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 201:108411.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Sweet, M.L., Blewden, C.J., Carter, A.M. and Mills, C.A. [1996] Modeling Heterogeneity in a Low-Permeability Gas Reservoir Using Geostatistical Techniques, Hyde Field, Southern North Sea.AAPG Bulletin80(11): 1719–1734.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Tahmasebi, P. [2018] Multiple Point Statistics: A Review, pages 613–643. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
    [Google Scholar]