oa Extremely Low Magnetic Susceptibility in the Lubny (S5, Mis 13) Pedocomplex at the Type Locality Vyazivok (Central Ukrainian Loess Belt)

References

1. Bakhmutov, V., & Hlavatskyi, D. (2022). On the reliability of a stratigraphic interpretation that overlooks geophysical techniques and results when determining the age of loess-soil deposits – comment on Łanczont et al. (2022) “A remarkable last glacial loess sedimentation at Roxolany in the Dniester Liman (Southern Ukraine)”. Quaternary Science Reviews, 297, 107668.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bakhmutov, V., Hlavatskyi, D., & Poliachenko, I. (2023). Magnetostratigraphy of the Pleistocene loess-palaeosol sequences in Ukraine and Moldova: a historical overview and recent developments.Geological Quarterly, 67.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bradák, B., Seto, Y., & Nawrocki, J. (2019). Significant pedogenic and palaeoenvironmental changes during the early Middle Pleistocene in Central Europe.Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 534, 109335.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Haesaerts, P., Damblon, F., Gerasimenko, N., Spagna, P., & Pirson, S. (2016) The Late Pleistocene Loess-Palaeosol Sequence of Middle Belgium.Quaternary International, 411, 25–43.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hlavatskyi, D.V., & Bakhmutov, V.G. (2020). Magnetostratigraphy and magnetic susceptibility of the best developed Pleistocene loess-palaeosol sequences of Ukraine: implications for correlation and proposed chronostratigraphic models.Geological Quarterly, 64(3), 723–753.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lu, H., Jia, J., Wang, Y., Yin, Q., & Xia, D. (2018). The cause of extremely high magnetic susceptibility of the S5S1 paleosol in the central Chinese Loess Plateau.Quaternary International, 493, 252–257.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Makó, L., Cseh, P., Nagy, B., Sümegi, P., & Molnár, D. (2023). Development History of the Loess–Paleosol Profiles of Pécel, Kisdorog and Bonyhádvarasd, Hungary.Quaternary, 6, 38.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Namier, N., Gao, X., Hao, Q., Marković, S., Fu, Y., Song, Y., Zhang, H., Wu, X., Deng, C., et al. (2021). Mineral magnetic properties of loess–paleosol couplets of northern Serbia over the last 1.0 Ma.Quaternary Research, 103, 35–48.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Rousseau, D.-D., Gerasimenko, N., Matviischina, Z., & Kukla, G. (2001) Late Pleistocene Environments of the Central Ukraine. Quaternary Research, 56, 349–356.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Scheidt, S., Hambach, U., Hao, Q., Rolf, C., & Wennrich, V. (2020). Environmental signals of Pliocene-Pleistocene climatic changes in Central Europe: Insights from the mineral magnetic record of the Heidelberg Basin sedimentary infill (Germany).Global and Planetary Change, 187, 103112.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Sümegi, P., Gulyás, S., Molnár, D., Sümegi, B.P., Almond, P.C., Vandenberghe, J., Zhou, L., Pál-Molnár, E., Törőcsik, T., Hao, Q., et al. (2018) New Chronology of the Best Developed Loess/Paleosol Sequence of Hungary Capturing the Past 1.1 Ma: Implications for Correlation and Proposed Pan-Eurasian Stratigraphic Schemes.Quaternary Science Reviews, 191, 144–166.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Zeeden, C., Hambach, U., Obreht, I., Hao, Q., Abels, H.A., Veres, D., Lehmkuhl, F., Gavrilov, M.B., & Marković, S.B. (2018). Patterns and Timing of Loess-Paleosol Transitions in Eurasia: Constraints for Paleoclimate Studies.Global and Planetary Change, 162, 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]