1887

Abstract

Summary

The issues of land plots exchange at land consolidation within agricultural land masses have been scrutinized. The goal of the study is the optimization of land plots exchange through the implementation of GIS technology. The modeling is based on the selection of land plots, which differ by no more than 10% of the lesser of land plots values. The inaccuracy of peerness determination by the existing approaches has been substantiated. The model has been approbated on an agricultural land mass in Poltava Region, Ukraine. The results can be used for the substantiation of the optimal land plots exchange options based on the heuristic, or optimizational method and their combination.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023510098
2023-10-02
2025-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2023/geoterrace-2023/GeoTerrace-2023-098.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023510098&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. SintayehuG., DirkC., EsayasA. & JosO. (2021). Multi-criteria decision-making methods to address rural land allocation problems: A systematic review.International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 9 (4), 490–501.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. HartvigsenM. (2016). Integrated Voluntary land Consolidation – A third Model for Land Consolidation and Land banking in Central and Eastern Europe.Land Tenure Journal, 1, 9–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. InceyolY. & ÖzbeyazA. (2016). A Model of Automatic Block Reallocation in the Land Consolidation Projects Using Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm.International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications, 4, 255–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MalashevskyiM., KovalchukI. & MalashevskaO. (2021). Land Reallotment over the Course of the Development of a Rural Settlement in Ukraine.Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 15, (3), 115–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MalashevskyiM. & MalashevskaO. (2022). Land Consolidation Considering Natural Afforestation.Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 16, (2), 5–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MalashevskyiM. & MalashevskaO. (2022). The Theory of Combinations for Land Plot Exchange Modelling in the Course of Land Consolidation.Geodesy and Cartography, 48(1), 11–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MotevaM. (2020). Legal Conditions and Data Provision for Land Property Exchange in the Processes of Land Consolidation and Land Compensation in Bulgaria.Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 14 (2), 59–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. RashidpourL., & RasouliA. S. (2016). Analysis of the Barriers Leading to Failure of Land Consolidation of the Fields. Scientific Papers.Series “Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and rural development”, 16(3), 285–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sabates-WheelerR. (2002). Consolidation initiatives after land reform: responses to multiple dimensions of land fragmentation in Eastern European agriculture.Journal of international Development, 14, 1005–1018.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SulonenaК., KotilainenS., & HiironenJ. (2017). Voluntary Land Consolidation Approaches and Their Adaptability to Experimental Farm-based Land Consolidation in Finland.Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 12(1), 59–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1998). On Land Lease.Bulletin of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 46.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2002). Land code Ukraine.Bulletin of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 3–4.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023510098
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023510098
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error