1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

The model results concerning monitoring of geoecological situation in land use was matched and compared for selected megaregion of Ukraine and the whole Germany. The geoecological situation in 3 Ukrainian physic-geographic sub-regions is unfavorable, in 10 – excessively unfavorable, and in 12 – catastrophic. Relating the Ukrainian physic-geographic districts, this situation is excessively favorable in only one of them (1%), It is favorable in 5 districts (4%), moderately unfavorable in 8 (6%) and unfavorable in 12 (9%). Instead in 48 (37%) districts the geosituation was identified as excessively unfavorable, and in 56 (43%) – at all catastrophic. In 6 states of Germany geosituation in land use is unfavorable, in 8 – excessively unfavorable, and in 2 – catastrophic. This situation varies in German districts from very favorable (1 district) through favorable (13 or 3% of districts), moderately unfavorable (36 or 9%), unfavorable (89 or 22%) and extremely unfavorable (232 or 58%) to catastrophic (31 or 8%). Monitoring-analogous comparison of obtained model parameters regarding geosituation for the selected megaregion in Ukraine with adequate representative results for Germany indicated their coincidence by content. All this verifies the objectivity and interoperability of the proposed tools for model assessment of the geosituation and implementation validity of such tools.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520009
2023-11-07
2025-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2023/monitoring'2023/Mon23-009.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520009&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bilous, L., Samoilenko, V., Shyshchenko, P., Havrylenko, O. (2021) GIS in landscape architecture and design.European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. Conference Proceedings, Geoinformatics, May 2021, V.2021: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215521034
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ESA (2015) European Space Agency. CCI Land Cover Map. Web source: http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HavrylenkoO., TsyhanokYe., ShyshchenkoP., SamoilenkoV., BilousL. (2021) Geoinformation support for urban green space planning in the conditions of climate change (by the case of Kyiv).European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. Conference Proceedings, Geoinformatics, May 2021, V.2021: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215521007
    [Google Scholar]
  4. IOER-monitor (2018). Monitor of Settlement and Open Space Development. Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development. Available at: http://www.ioer-monitor.de
    [Google Scholar]
  5. National Atlas (2007). National atlas of Ukraine (electronic version).Institute of Geography of NASU, SRPE ‘Cartography’ et al.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. NGCC (2011) National Geomatics Center of China. Globeland30 Land Cover Map. Web source: http://www.globallandcover.com/GLC30Download
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Paracchini, M.L., Capitani, C. (2011). Implementation of an EU wide indicator for the rural-agrarian landscape.JRC scientific and technical reports (EUR 25114 EN-2011). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 89 p. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2788/25137
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Samoilenko, V., Bilous, L., Havrylenko, O., Dibrova, I. (2021) Geoinformation model cause-effect analysis of anthropogenic impact in the Podilsko-Prydniprovskyi region.European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. Conference Proceedings, Geoinformatics, May 2021, V.2021: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215521006
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Walz, U., Stein, C. (2014). Indicators of hemeroby for the monitoring of landscapes in Germany.Journal for Nature Conservation, 22, 279–289. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2014.01.007
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520009
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error