1887

Abstract

Summary

This work represents the fundamental principles of the developed technology for constructing 3D gravitational models, which includes the structure and general provisions of model parametrization, the software complex for automated interpretation of potential fields (GMT-Auto), developed at the S. Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, and the final stage of modeling depending on the set tasks. The model’s structure is determined by a priori geological-geophysical information and the modeling objectives. The density properties of rocks are essential for the physical substantiation of 3D gravitational modeling and improving the accuracy of geological interpretation of the obtained data. The use of the automated complex GMT-Auto significantly facilitates and expedites the process of interpreting the gravity field using three-dimensional numerical modeling and greatly enhances the resolution and interpretational capabilities of the volumetric geological environment. By applying the developed technology in conjunction with modern specialized software like GMT-Auto, new possibilities for 3D gravitational modeling are provided, catering to various scales for solving complex and significant applied tasks in modern geology. These tasks range from regional models of large territories to more detailed individual geological structures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520018
2023-11-07
2025-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2023/monitoring'2023/Mon23-018.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520018&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aronov, V.I. (1990). Methods for constructing maps of geological and geophysical features and geometrization of oil and gas deposits on a computer. Moskow: Nedra, 303 p. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bychkov, S. G. (2010). Methods of processing and interpretation of gravity observations in solving problems of petroleum geology.Ekaterinburg: MI UBRAS Publ., 188 p. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gao, D. (2009). 3D seismic volume visualization and interpretation: An integrated workflow with case studies.Geophysics, 74 (1), W1–W12.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Makarenko, I.B., Starostenko, V.I., Kuprienko, P.YA., Savchenko, O.S., Legostaeva, O.V. (2021). Heterogeneity of the Earth’s crust of Ukraine and adjacent regions inferred from 3D gravity modelling. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 204 p. (in Ukrainian)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rogers, D., Adams, J. (1989). Mathematical elements for computer graphics. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, 512 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Shlezinger, M., Glavach, V. (2004). Ten Lectures on Statistical and Structural Recognition. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 535 p. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shlezinger, M.I. (1989). Mathematical tools of image processing. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 200 p. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Starostenko, V.I., Sharypanov, V.M., Sharypanov, A. V., Savchenko, A.S., LegostayevaO.V., MakarenkoI.B., KuprienkoP.Ya. (2016). Interactive software package Isohypse for three-dimensional geological and geophysical models, and its practical use.Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 38(1), 30–42. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yakimchyk, A.I. (2010). A technology of digitization of practical materials maps based on software programs Maplnfo Professional and CorelDRAW.Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 32(3), 112–124. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520018
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520018
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error